Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co [1892] AC 25 is an English tort law case concerning the economic tort of conspiracy to injure. A product of its time, the courts adhered to a laissez faire doctrine allowing firms to form a cartel, which would now be seen as contrary to the Competition Act 1998. It is notable for Lord Bramwell's dictum that:
Charles Bowen, Baron BowenCommonwealth v. HuntEconomic torts in English lawEdward FryGeorge Bramwell, 1st Baron BramwellHardinge Giffard, 1st Earl of HalsburyHistory of United States antitrust lawHistory of labour law in the United KingdomLoewe v. LawlorMogul Steamship CoMogul Steamship Co v MacGregorMogul Steamship Company's CaseMogul Steamship Company v McGregorQuinn v LeathemSteamship Co. v. McGregorUnited Kingdom labour lawVegelahn v. Guntner
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co [1892] AC 25 is an English tort law case concerning the economic tort of conspiracy to injure. A product of its time, the courts adhered to a laissez faire doctrine allowing firms to form a cartel, which would now be seen as contrary to the Competition Act 1998. It is notable for Lord Bramwell's dictum that:
has abstract
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGre ...... gislature has now so declared.
@en
Wikipage page ID
27,024,427
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
830,704,095
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[1892] AC 25
@en
judges
Lord Halsbury LC, Lord Watson, ...... orris, Lord Field, Lord Hannen
@en
keywords
name
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
@en
prior actions
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGre ...... r Lord Bramwell's dictum that:
@en
label
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
@en