Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
Den ex dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improv. Co., 59 U.S. (18 How.) 272 (1856), was a case before the United States Supreme Court. The issue adjudicated was whether a distress warrant, issued pursuant to statute, was valid and constitutional
59 U.S. 272Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improv. Co.John Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyJohn Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyJohn Den v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyMurray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
Wikipage redirect
59 U.S. 272Article Three of the United States ConstitutionDen Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improv. Co.Federal tribunals in the United StatesJohn Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyJohn Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyJohn Den v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement CompanyMurray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Separation of powers under the United States ConstitutionSubstantive due process
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
Den ex dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improv. Co., 59 U.S. (18 How.) 272 (1856), was a case before the United States Supreme Court. The issue adjudicated was whether a distress warrant, issued pursuant to statute, was valid and constitutional
has abstract
Den ex dem. Murray v. Hoboken ...... , was valid and constitutional
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
23,668,359
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,019,090,748
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case
Den ex dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improv. Co.,
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
John Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v. The Hoboken Land & Improvement Company
@en
googlescholar
JoinMajority
unanimous court
@en
justia
Litigants
John Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v. The Hoboken Land & Improvement Company
@en
majority
Curtis
@en
openjurist
ParallelCitations
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Den ex dem. Murray v. Hoboken ...... , was valid and constitutional
@en
label
Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
John Den, ex dem. James B. Murray et al. v. The Hoboken Land & Improvement Company
@en