NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292 (1939), is a US labor law case where the US Supreme Court held 5-to-2 that the National Labor Relations Act required decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) to be based on substantial evidence. The Supreme Court overturned a ruling of the Board (requiring an employer to rehire striking workers) for not being based on substantial evidence. The Court also held that only the representative of the workers (the union) could issue collective bargaining proposals under the law, and that proposals transmitted by a third party did not trigger the Act's protections or duties.
primaryTopic
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292 (1939), is a US labor law case where the US Supreme Court held 5-to-2 that the National Labor Relations Act required decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) to be based on substantial evidence. The Supreme Court overturned a ruling of the Board (requiring an employer to rehire striking workers) for not being based on substantial evidence. The Court also held that only the representative of the workers (the union) could issue collective bargaining proposals under the law, and that proposals transmitted by a third party did not trigger the Act's protections or duties.
has abstract
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & ...... e Act's protections or duties.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
29,690,556
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
933,611,400
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.,
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Black
@en
findlaw
fullname
National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Decisions of the NLRB must be ...... for bargaining under the NLRA.
@en
JoinDissent
Reed
@en
JoinMajority
Hughes, McReynolds, Butler, Roberts
@en
justia
LawsApplied
National Labor Relations Act
@en
Litigants
National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
@en
majority
Stone
@en
NotParticipating
Frankfurter
@en
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & ...... e Act's protections or duties.
@en
label
NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.
@en