New York v. United States
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, found that the federal government may not require states to “take title” to radioactive waste through the "Take Title" provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act, which the Court found to exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. The Court permitted the federal government to induce shifts in state waste policy through other means.
Wikipage redirect
505 U.S. 144Cooperative federalismFederalism in the United StatesList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist CourtList of environmental lawsuitsMurphy v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationNational Popular Vote Interstate CompactNew York v. United States (1992)New York v United StatesNullification (U.S. Constitution)Printz v. United StatesReno v. CondonStewart BakerTenth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionUnfunded mandateWilliam Rehnquist
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
New York v. United States
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, found that the federal government may not require states to “take title” to radioactive waste through the "Take Title" provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act, which the Court found to exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. The Court permitted the federal government to induce shifts in state waste policy through other means.
has abstract
New York v. United States, 505 ...... te policy through other means.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
13,460,657
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,023,574,413
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
New York v. United States,
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Stevens
@en
White
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
New York, Petitioner, v. Unite ...... ioner, v. United States et al.
@en
Holding
The "take title" provision of ...... wer under the Commerce Clause.
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Blackmun, Stevens
@en
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, as well as White, Blackmun, Stevens
@en
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amend. X; U.S. Con ...... Policy Amendments Act of 1985
@en
Litigants
New York v. United States
@en
majority
O'Connor
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
Subsequent
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
New York v. United States, 505 ...... te policy through other means.
@en
label
New York v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
New York, Petitioner, v. Unite ...... ioner, v. United States et al.
@en