One transaction rule
In Australian law, the one transaction rule or single transaction principle is when two or more offences are committed in the course of a single act, all sentences should be concurrent rather than consecutive. Despite its imprecise nature, the one transaction rule is a long-standing sentencing principle recognised in Australia as a 'good working rule': Ruane v The Queen (1979) 1 A Crim R 284, 286 cited in R v White [2002] WASCA 112, [15]; see also Dickens v The Queen [2004] WASCA 179,
primaryTopic
One transaction rule
In Australian law, the one transaction rule or single transaction principle is when two or more offences are committed in the course of a single act, all sentences should be concurrent rather than consecutive. Despite its imprecise nature, the one transaction rule is a long-standing sentencing principle recognised in Australia as a 'good working rule': Ruane v The Queen (1979) 1 A Crim R 284, 286 cited in R v White [2002] WASCA 112, [15]; see also Dickens v The Queen [2004] WASCA 179,
has abstract
In Australian law, the one tra ...... sentencing Judge's discretion.
@en
Wikipage page ID
37,797,772
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,020,614,165
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
In Australian law, the one tra ...... v The Queen [2004] WASCA 179,
@en
label
One transaction rule
@en