Oshlack v Richmond River Council
Oshlack v Richmond River Council is a decision of the High Court of Australia. The case is notable for its statements regarding costs orders in the context of public interest litigation. Its facts concerned an application for costs against an unsuccessful litigant in a case relevant to the public interest. The High Court decided by majority that the discretion of the trial judge not to make a costs order against Oshlack ought be upheld. Oshlack is an important case in Australian civil procedure. It is the 23rd most cited High Court case according to LawCite.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
Oshlack v Richmond River Council is a decision of the High Court of Australia. The case is notable for its statements regarding costs orders in the context of public interest litigation. Its facts concerned an application for costs against an unsuccessful litigant in a case relevant to the public interest. The High Court decided by majority that the discretion of the trial judge not to make a costs order against Oshlack ought be upheld. Oshlack is an important case in Australian civil procedure. It is the 23rd most cited High Court case according to LawCite.
has abstract
Oshlack v Richmond River Counc ...... urt case according to LawCite.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
67,155,383
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,016,790,838
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
date decided
full name
Oshlack v Richmond River Council https://jade.io/article/68031
@en
judges
Brennan CJ,
Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, and Kirby JJ
@en
name
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
@en
opinions
Brennan CJ
@en
Gaudron & Gummow JJ
@en
Kirby J
@en
McHugh J
@en
The trial judge's discretion n ...... erest litigant ought be upheld
@en
dissenting
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Oshlack v Richmond River Counc ...... urt case according to LawCite.
@en
label
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
@en