Policy debate
Policy debate is a form of debate competition in which teams of two advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X, CX, Cross-ex, or C-X) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of Policy Debate; however, ethical arguments also play a major role in deciding the outcome of the round. The main argument being debated during a round of Cross Examination is which team has a greater impact. This factor alone can decide the winner of a round. Whichever team can prove the greater impact is likely to win the round. When a team explains why their impacts are "greater" th
Wikipage disambiguates
Abraham Lincoln High School (Los Angeles, California)
Central High School (Aberdeen, South Dakota)
Coppell High School
Elmer L. Meyers Junior/Senior High School
Abraham WickelgrenAdvantage (debate)AffirmativeAffirmative (policy debate)AffirmativesAnand VeeravaguBBC TwoBalkan Trust for DemocracyBalkans in Europe Policy Advisory GroupBaltimore Urban Debate LeagueBancroft Literary Association and Carrollton-Wight Literary SocietyBig Spring High SchoolBlue_Valley_High_SchoolBob ShrumBroad_Run_High_SchoolBroadband open accessCXCX DebateCX debateCalifornia High School Speech AssociationChristopher McDonald (jurist)CounterplanCross-examination debateCross Examination Debate AssociationCx debateDabaitDamien_High_SchoolDaniel NexonDb8DebateDebate (disambiguation)DisadvantageEconomic freedomEdina High SchoolElizabeth_WarrenEvidence (policy debate)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Policy debate
Policy debate is a form of debate competition in which teams of two advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X, CX, Cross-ex, or C-X) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of Policy Debate; however, ethical arguments also play a major role in deciding the outcome of the round. The main argument being debated during a round of Cross Examination is which team has a greater impact. This factor alone can decide the winner of a round. Whichever team can prove the greater impact is likely to win the round. When a team explains why their impacts are "greater" th
has abstract
Policy debate is a form of deb ...... the collegiate level as well.
@en
政策性辩论(Policy debate),是一种特定形式的辩 ...... 下进行比赛。而单人制的政策性辩论比赛则主要由(NFA)举办。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,024,219,700
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
comment
Policy debate is a form of deb ...... their impacts are "greater" th
@en
政策性辩论(Policy debate),是一种特定形式的辩 ...... 下进行比赛。而单人制的政策性辩论比赛则主要由(NFA)举办。
@zh
label
Policy debate
@en
政策性辩论
@zh