R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet
R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate [2000] 1 AC 61, 119 and 147 is a set of three UK constitutional law judgments by the House of Lords that examined whether former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was entitled to claim state immunity from torture allegations made by a Spanish court and therefore avoid extradition to Spain. They have proven to be of landmark significance in international criminal law and human rights law.
Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v.Pinochet (No. 1)Pinochet (No. 2)Pinochet (No. 3)Pinochet IPinochet IIPinochet IIIPinochet caseR. v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex p. Pinochet Ugarte (No.2)R v Bow St Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p PinochetR v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No. 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet UgarteR v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3)R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)
Wikipage redirect
Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v.Doctrine of bias in Singapore lawDonald Nicholls, Baron Nicholls of BirkenheadEx parteGordon Slynn, Baron Slynn of HadleyImmunity from prosecution (international law)Indictment and arrest of Augusto PinochetJudicial disqualificationJudicial functions of the House of LordsLennie Hoffmann, Baron HoffmannMetropolitan Properties Co (FGC) Ltd v LannonNatural justiceNick Browne-Wilkinson, Baron Browne-WilkinsonPinochet (No. 1)Pinochet (No. 2)Pinochet (No. 3)Pinochet IPinochet IIPinochet IIIPinochet caseProcedural impropriety in Singapore administrative lawR. v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex p. Pinochet Ugarte (No.2)R v Bow St Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p PinochetR v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No. 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet UgarteR v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.3)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 2)R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 3)R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthyReed Brody
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet
R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate [2000] 1 AC 61, 119 and 147 is a set of three UK constitutional law judgments by the House of Lords that examined whether former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was entitled to claim state immunity from torture allegations made by a Spanish court and therefore avoid extradition to Spain. They have proven to be of landmark significance in international criminal law and human rights law.
has abstract
El caso Pinochet, oficialmente ...... e sesgo en uno de sus jueces.
@es
R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St M ...... ction over crimes of torture).
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
34,998,622
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,025,784,850
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
caption
Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet
@en
citations
[1998] UKHL 41, [2000] 1 AC 61
@en
court
date decided
1998-11-25
full name
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte
@en
judges
name
R v Bow St Magistrate
@en
prior actions
Augusto Pinochet Ugarte, [1999] 38 ILM 68
@en
subsequent actions
No 2 [1999] UKHL 52, [2000] 1 AC 119.
No 3 [1999] UKHL 17, [2000] 1 AC 147.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
El caso Pinochet, oficialmente ...... vadir su extradición a España.
@es
R (Pinochet Ugarte) v Bow St M ...... inal law and human rights law.
@en
label
Caso Pinochet
@es
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet
@en