R v Cinous
R v Cinous, 2002 SCC 29 is a 2002 case of the Supreme Court of Canada which held that in order for a defence to be presented to a jury, that defence must possess an "air of reality"; that is, "if a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acquit the accused on the basis of the defence".
Wikipage redirect
seeAlso
primaryTopic
R v Cinous
R v Cinous, 2002 SCC 29 is a 2002 case of the Supreme Court of Canada which held that in order for a defence to be presented to a jury, that defence must possess an "air of reality"; that is, "if a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acquit the accused on the basis of the defence".
has abstract
R c. Cinous, est une arrêt de ...... it avoir un « air de réalité».
@fr
R v Cinous, 2002 SCC 29 is a 2 ...... on the basis of the defence".
@en
Wikipage page ID
31,420,415
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,012,003,296
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case-name
R v Cinous
@en
Concurrence
Binnie J
@en
decided-date
2002-03-21
Dissent
Arbour
@en
full-case-name
Her Majesty The Queen v Jacques Cinous
@en
heard-date
2001-04-18
JoinConcurrence
Gonthier J
@en
JoinDissent
Iacobucci and Major JJ
@en
JoinMajority
L'Heureux-Dubé and LeBel JJ
@en
majority
McLachlin CJ and Bastarache J
@en
ruling
Appeal allowed and respondent's conviction restored.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
comment
R c. Cinous, est une arrêt de ...... it avoir un « air de réalité».
@fr
R v Cinous, 2002 SCC 29 is a 2 ...... on the basis of the defence".
@en
label
R v Cinous
@en
R. c. Cinous
@fr