R v Pamajewon
R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that the right to self-government, if it exists, is subject to reasonable limitations and excluded the right to control high-stakes gambling.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
R v Pamajewon
R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 821, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on Aboriginal self-government under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that the right to self-government, if it exists, is subject to reasonable limitations and excluded the right to control high-stakes gambling.
has abstract
R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. ...... control high-stakes gambling.
@en
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
921,773,634
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case-name
R v Pamajewon
@en
citations
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 821
@en
Concurrence
L’Heureux‑Dubé J.
@en
decided-date
1996-08-22
full-case-name
Howard Pamajewon and Roger Jon ...... ardner v Her Majesty The Queen
@en
heard-date
1996-02-26
JoinMajority
La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
@en
LawsApplied
R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507
@en
majority
Lamer C.J.
@en
ruling
Pamajewon appeal dismissed.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
R v Pamajewon, [1996] 2 S.C.R. ...... control high-stakes gambling.
@en
label
R v Pamajewon
@en