R v Peacock
R v Peacock was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. In December 2009, the defendant, a male escort named Michael Peacock, had been charged by the Metropolitan Police for selling hardcore gay pornography that the police believed had the ability to "deprave or corrupt" the viewer, which was illegal under the Obscene Publications Act. He was subsequently acquitted through a trial by jury in January 2012.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
R v Peacock
R v Peacock was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. In December 2009, the defendant, a male escort named Michael Peacock, had been charged by the Metropolitan Police for selling hardcore gay pornography that the police believed had the ability to "deprave or corrupt" the viewer, which was illegal under the Obscene Publications Act. He was subsequently acquitted through a trial by jury in January 2012.
has abstract
R v Peacock was an English Cro ...... ed tweeting in English Courts.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
34,308,252
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,014,223,545
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
align
right
@en
bgcolor
#c6dbf7
@en
caption
Michael Peacock celebrating his victory outside Southwark Crown Court.
@en
court
Southwark Crown Court
@en
date decided
2012-01-06
fontsize
full name
R v Michael Peacock
@en
imagesize
name
R v Peacock
@en
quote
"Perhaps illogically, of these ...... area by electing jury trial."
@en
salign
right
@en
source
Myles Jackman, defence solicitor.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
R v Peacock was an English Cro ...... trial by jury in January 2012.
@en
label
R v Peacock
@en