Ross v HM Advocate
HM Advocate v Ross was a 1991 Scots criminal law case decided by the High Court of Justiciary. The defendant had been charged with violently attacking others in a public house, but was allowed to go free on the premise that he was in a state of non-self-induced automatism. Others in the bar had slipped LSD and other drugs into his beer without him knowing, and there was only a small amount of alcohol he had been drinking so he was not responsible for his intoxication which led to the violent actions.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Ross v HM Advocate
HM Advocate v Ross was a 1991 Scots criminal law case decided by the High Court of Justiciary. The defendant had been charged with violently attacking others in a public house, but was allowed to go free on the premise that he was in a state of non-self-induced automatism. Others in the bar had slipped LSD and other drugs into his beer without him knowing, and there was only a small amount of alcohol he had been drinking so he was not responsible for his intoxication which led to the violent actions.
has abstract
HM Advocate v Ross was a 1991 ...... e followed in England as well.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
21,351,954
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
819,372,481
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
HM Advocate v Ross was a 1991 ...... ch led to the violent actions.
@en
label
Ross v HM Advocate
@en