Roth v. United States
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v. California, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which redefined the Constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment.
1966 in literature1966 in the United States354 U.S. 476Adult film industry regulationsAlberts v. CaliforniaAmerican AphroditeAmerican Civil Liberties UnionAnn BannonAnti-pornography movement in the United StatesBarnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Commonwealth v. SharplessCommunity standardsComstock lawsFanny HillFirst Amendment to the United States ConstitutionFreedom of speech in the United StatesGinzburg v. United StatesHardcore pornographyHicklin testHowlI know it when I see itJacobellis v. OhioJerome FrankJohn Marshall Harlan IIJune 24Kois v. WisconsinLGBT rights in the United StatesList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First AmendmentList of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties UnionList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesList of overruled United States Supreme Court decisionsList of sex-related court cases in the United StatesManual Enterprises, Inc. v. DayMarcus v. Search WarrantMarks v. United StatesMemoirs v. MassachusettsMiller v. CaliforniaONE, Inc.Obscenity
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Roth v. United States
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v. California, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which redefined the Constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment.
has abstract
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S ...... tected by the First Amendment.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,021,872,797
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Roth v. United States,
@en
Concurrence
Warren
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Douglas
@en
Harlan
@en
fullname
David S. Alberts v. California
@en
Samuel Roth v. United States;
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment; more strictly defined "obscene."
@en
JoinDissent
Black
@en
JoinMajority
Frankfurter, Burton, Clark, Whittaker
@en
justia
Litigants
Roth v. United States
@en
majority
Brennan
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
superseded
Miller v. California,
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S ...... tected by the First Amendment.
@en
label
Roth v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
David S. Alberts v. California
@en
Samuel Rothv. United States;
@en