Scholarly peer review
Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected.
type
Wikipage disambiguates
Academic peer reviewAcademic reviewAdvance publication reviewBlind reviewConclusion-blind reviewCriticism of scholarly peer reviewDesk rejectDesk rejectionDouble-blind peer reviewOpen Peer CommentaryOpen peer commentaryOutcome-unbiased journalsPPPRPeer-review failurePeer review failurePeer review failuresPost-publication peer reviewPostpublication reviewPre-accepted articlesPrior to results submissionRefereed serialRegistered reportsResult-blind peer reviewResult-blind reviewingResults blind peer reviewRubriqScholarly reviewScientific peer review
Wikipage redirect
2 Minute MedicineAcademic peer reviewAcademic publishingAcademic reviewActa Mechanica et AutomaticaAdvance publication reviewAmazon_RiverAmerican Journal of BioethicsAnimal Sentience (journal)Anonymous peer reviewArXivArchitecture Media Politics SocietyArthur LavineArticle processing chargeBehavioral and Brain SciencesBeryl May DentBiology DirectBlind reviewBritish Records AssociationCanadian Literature (journal)China ReportClimate FeedbackCollective intelligenceConclusion-blind reviewConference proceedingCriticism of scholarly peer reviewCureusDavid E. BloomDesk rejectDesk rejectionDouble-blind peer reviewEarly decisionEducational Psychologist (journal)Educational researchEthics (journal)European Journal of PersonalityEvidence-based practiceExpert witnessFaculty of 1000Gatekeeper
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
type
seeAlso
primaryTopic
Scholarly peer review
Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected.
has abstract
La (también conocida como arbi ...... eLife, BMJ y BioMed Central .
@es
Penelaahan sejawat ilmiah (jug ...... ang pengulas juga diungkapkan.
@in
Scholarly peer review (also kn ...... Life, BMJ, and BioMed Central.
@en
مراجعة الأقران العلمية ( ويشار ...... ؤهلات معادلة لمؤهلاته أو أعلى.
@ar
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
33,158,412
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,016,922,427
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
date
January 2016
@en
reason
no direct connection to peer review in this info
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
type
comment
La (también conocida como arbi ...... le con revisiones o rechazado.
@es
Penelaahan sejawat ilmiah (jug ...... a dengan revisi, atau ditolak.
@in
Scholarly peer review (also kn ...... e with revisions, or rejected.
@en
مراجعة الأقران العلمية ( ويشار ...... ؤهلات معادلة لمؤهلاته أو أعلى.
@ar
label
Penelaahan sejawat ilmiah
@in
Revisión académica por pares
@es
Scholarly peer review
@en
Wissenschaftliches Peer-Review
@de
مراجعة الأقران العلمية
@ar