Scott v. Harris
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought by a motorist who was paralyzed after the officer ran his eluding vehicle off the road during a high-speed car chase. The driver contended that this action was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The case also involved the question of whether a police officer's qualified immunity shielded him from suit under Section 1983. On April 30, 2007, in an 8—1 decision, the court sided with police and ruled that a "police officer's attempt to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even when it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Scott v. Harris
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought by a motorist who was paralyzed after the officer ran his eluding vehicle off the road during a high-speed car chase. The driver contended that this action was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The case also involved the question of whether a police officer's qualified immunity shielded him from suit under Section 1983. On April 30, 2007, in an 8—1 decision, the court sided with police and ruled that a "police officer's attempt to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even when it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury
has abstract
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 ...... ted in the Harvard Law Review.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,003,284,845
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Scott v. Harris,
@en
Concurrence
Breyer
@en
Ginsburg
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Stevens
@en
fullname
Timothy Scott v. Victor Harris
@en
Holding
Because the car chase responde ...... entitled to summary judgment.
@en
JoinMajority
Roberts, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito
@en
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Const. amend. IV;
@en
Litigants
Scott v. Harris
@en
majority
Scalia
@en
other source
Supreme Court
@en
other url
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 ...... ist at risk of serious injury
@en
label
Scott v. Harris
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Timothy Scott v. Victor Harris
@en