Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62 is an English contract law case decided in the House of Lords, on the subject of mistaken identity as a basis for rescission of a contract. The case has been the subject of much criticism in failing to effectively clarify the area of mistake to identity.
Wikipage redirect
Cundy v LindsayDonald Nicholls, Baron Nicholls of BirkenheadEnglish contract lawJohn Hobhouse, Baron Hobhouse of WoodboroughList of House of Lords casesMistake in English contract lawMorrisson v RobertsonNemo dat quod non habetNick Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth MatraversPeter Millett, Baron MillettPhillips v Brooks LtdShogun Finance Ltd v. HudsonShogun Finance v Hudson
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62 is an English contract law case decided in the House of Lords, on the subject of mistaken identity as a basis for rescission of a contract. The case has been the subject of much criticism in failing to effectively clarify the area of mistake to identity.
has abstract
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2 ...... e area of mistake to identity.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
20,240,517
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
853,067,578
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
caption
A Mitsubishi Shogun
@en
citations
[2004] 1 AC 919; [2003] UKHL 62
@en
court
House of Lords
@en
date decided
2003-12-19
judges
keywords
mistaken identity, rescission
@en
name
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
@en
prior actions
[2001] EWCA Civ 1000
@en
transcripts
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2 ...... e area of mistake to identity.
@en
label
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
@en