Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.
Specht v. Netscape, 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002), is a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the enforceability of browse-wrap software licenses. The court held that merely clicking on a download button does not show assent to license terms if those terms were not conspicuous and if it was not explicit to the consumer that clicking meant agreeing to the license.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.
Specht v. Netscape, 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002), is a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the enforceability of browse-wrap software licenses. The court held that merely clicking on a download button does not show assent to license terms if those terms were not conspicuous and if it was not explicit to the consumer that clicking meant agreeing to the license.
has abstract
Specht v. Netscape, 306 F.3d 1 ...... meant agreeing to the license.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,014,371,822
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citations
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation
@en
Holding
Licenses are not enforceable i ...... iguous consent to those terms.
@en
JoinMajority
McLaughlin, Leval
@en
judges
Circuit Judges Sonia Sotomayor, Joseph M. McLaughlin, Pierre N. Leval
@en
Litigants
Specht v. Netscape
@en
majority
Sotomayor
@en
Procedural
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Specht v. Netscape, 306 F.3d 1 ...... meant agreeing to the license.
@en
label
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.
@en