Standard of review
In law, the standard of review is the amount of deference given by one court (or some other appellate tribunal) in reviewing a decision of a lower court or tribunal. A low standard of review means that the decision under review will be varied or overturned if the reviewing court considers there is any error at all in the lower court's decision. A high standard of review means that deference is accorded to the decision under review, so that it will not be disturbed just because the reviewing court might have decided the matter differently; it will be varied only if the higher court considers the decision to have obvious error. The standard of review may be set by statute or precedent (stare decisis). In the United States, "standard of review" also has a separate meaning concerning the level
Wikipage disambiguates
2009 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens2009 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts2009 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer2013 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor2014 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Clarence Thomas2014 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor2014 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer2016 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts2016 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Neil Gorsuch2016 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg2016 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor2018 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader GinsburgAcceptance of responsibilityActual innocenceAdministrative subpoenaAlternative dispute resolutionAmericans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationAppealAppellate procedure in the United StatesArbitrary, capricious and unreasonableArbitrary and capriciousArbitrary or capriciousAsha's MumsAssociated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury CorpAtlantic Coast PipelineBaltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Begum v Home SecretaryBose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Buford v. United StatesCampaign for AccountabilityCanada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam IncCanada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v KhosaCanada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v VavilovCanadian Broadcasting Corp v Canada (Labour Relations Board)Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 963 v New Brunswick Liquor CorpCanadian administrative lawCapriciousCircuit Court (Ireland)Clear error
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
seeAlso
primaryTopic
Standard of review
In law, the standard of review is the amount of deference given by one court (or some other appellate tribunal) in reviewing a decision of a lower court or tribunal. A low standard of review means that the decision under review will be varied or overturned if the reviewing court considers there is any error at all in the lower court's decision. A high standard of review means that deference is accorded to the decision under review, so that it will not be disturbed just because the reviewing court might have decided the matter differently; it will be varied only if the higher court considers the decision to have obvious error. The standard of review may be set by statute or precedent (stare decisis). In the United States, "standard of review" also has a separate meaning concerning the level
has abstract
In law, the standard of review ...... stitutionality of legislation.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,022,220,308
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
In law, the standard of review ...... e meaning concerning the level
@en
label
Standard of review
@en