State v. Yanz
State v. Yanz, 50 A. 37 (Conn. 1901), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Connecticut (then called the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors) that held that a provocation defense that reduced a murder charge to one of manslaughter is still valid even in the presence of a reasonable mistake of fact. Specifically, in the case where a man reasonably believed his wife was committing adultery and kills her alleged paramour, even where that belief was mistaken, the provocation would be enough to reduce the charge from murder to manslaughter.
State v. Yanz
State v. Yanz, 50 A. 37 (Conn. 1901), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Connecticut (then called the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors) that held that a provocation defense that reduced a murder charge to one of manslaughter is still valid even in the presence of a reasonable mistake of fact. Specifically, in the case where a man reasonably believed his wife was committing adultery and kills her alleged paramour, even where that belief was mistaken, the provocation would be enough to reduce the charge from murder to manslaughter.
has abstract
State v. Yanz, 50 A. 37 (Conn. ...... e from murder to manslaughter.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
26,297,446
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,015,667,505
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
concurring
Torrance and Hall
@en
date decided
1901-09-27
decision by
Baldwin
@en
dissenting
Andrews and Hamersley
@en
full name
The State of Connecticut v. George Yanz
@en
imagesize
name
State v. Yanz
@en
number of judges
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
State v. Yanz, 50 A. 37 (Conn. ...... e from murder to manslaughter.
@en
label
State v. Yanz
@en