Superintendent v. Hill
Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that due process required that prison disciplinary decisions to revoke good-time credits must be supported by "some evidence."
472 U.S. 445List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger CourtSuperintendent, Mass. Correctional Institute at Walpole v. HillSuperintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSuperintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v HillSuperintendent v HillWolff v. McDonnell
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Superintendent v. Hill
Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that due process required that prison disciplinary decisions to revoke good-time credits must be supported by "some evidence."
has abstract
Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U. ...... supported by "some evidence."
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
10,633,323
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,903,138
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Superintendent v. Hill,
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Stevens
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill et al.
@en
Holding
Due process requires that a de ...... supported by "some evidence".
@en
italic title
force
@en
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Brennan, Marshall
@en
JoinMajority
Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
@en
justia
Litigants
Superintendent v. Hill
@en
majority
O'Connor
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U. ...... supported by "some evidence."
@en
label
Superintendent v. Hill
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill et al.
@en