Tito v Waddell (No 2)
Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106 is an English trusts law case, concerning what counts as a trust, and creates fiduciary duties, and when specific performance will be ordered. It is important as an historical case that forced the eviction of the people from the island of Banaba. On the points of specific performance, it has been superseded in the cases of Ruxley Electronics Ltd v Forsyth. It stands as an historical example of an indigenous community exploited and expropriated by the mercantile mining interests of the British Empire.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Tito v Waddell (No 2)
Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106 is an English trusts law case, concerning what counts as a trust, and creates fiduciary duties, and when specific performance will be ordered. It is important as an historical case that forced the eviction of the people from the island of Banaba. On the points of specific performance, it has been superseded in the cases of Ruxley Electronics Ltd v Forsyth. It stands as an historical example of an indigenous community exploited and expropriated by the mercantile mining interests of the British Empire.
has abstract
Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] C ...... terests of the British Empire.
@en
Wikipage page ID
41,800,001
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,005,516,413
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
[1977] Ch 106
@en
court
Court of Appeal
@en
judges
Megarry VC
@en
keywords
Trust, fiduciary duties
@en
name
Tito v Waddell
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] C ...... terests of the British Empire.
@en
label
Tito v Waddell (No 2)
@en