United States v. Chadwick
United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that, absent , the warrantless search of double-locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. The Court reasoned that while luggage is movable like an automobile, it does not have the lesser expectation of privacy associated with an automobile. The holding in Chadwick that a search incident to arrest must not be too remote in time or place is still good law.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
United States v. Chadwick
United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that, absent , the warrantless search of double-locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. The Court reasoned that while luggage is movable like an automobile, it does not have the lesser expectation of privacy associated with an automobile. The holding in Chadwick that a search incident to arrest must not be too remote in time or place is still good law.
has abstract
United States v. Chadwick, 433 ...... me or place is still good law.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
19,345,856
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
977,256,562
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
United States v. Chadwick,
@en
Concurrence
Brennan
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Blackmun
@en
findlaw
fullname
United States v. Chadwick et al.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Absent exigency, the warrantle ...... nder the automobile exception.
@en
JoinDissent
Rehnquist
@en
JoinMajority
Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Powell, Stevens
@en
justia
Litigants
United States v. Chadwick
@en
majority
Burger
@en
Overruled
California v. Acevedo
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
United States v. Chadwick, 433 ...... me or place is still good law.
@en
label
United States v. Chadwick
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
United States v. Chadwick et al.
@en