United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, 348 U.S. 236 (1955), often referred to as International Boxing Club or just International Boxing, was an antitrust decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. By a 7–2 margin, the justices ruled that the exemption it had previously upheld for Major League Baseball was peculiar and unique to that sport and that it did not apply to boxing. Since it met the definition of interstate commerce, the government could therefore proceed with a trial to prove IBCNY and the other defendants had conspired to monopolize the market for championship boxing in the United States.
348 U.S. 236Federal Baseball Club v. National LeagueInternational Boxing Club of New YorkList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren CourtRadovich v. National Football LeagueUnited States antitrust lawUnited States v. International Boxing Club of New YorkUnited States v International Boxing Club of New York
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, 348 U.S. 236 (1955), often referred to as International Boxing Club or just International Boxing, was an antitrust decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. By a 7–2 margin, the justices ruled that the exemption it had previously upheld for Major League Baseball was peculiar and unique to that sport and that it did not apply to boxing. Since it met the definition of interstate commerce, the government could therefore proceed with a trial to prove IBCNY and the other defendants had conspired to monopolize the market for championship boxing in the United States.
has abstract
United States v. International ...... dies for antitrust violations.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
16,101,381
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,003,830,536
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.,
@en
cornell
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Frankfurter
@en
Minton
@en
findlaw
fullname
United States v. International ...... D. Norris and Arthur M. Wirtz
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Antitrust exemption granted by ...... o baseball as currently exists
@en
JoinDissent
Minton
@en
JoinMajority
Burton, Reed
@en
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
International Boxing Club of New York
@en
United States v.
@en
majority
Warren
@en
ParallelCitations
Subsequent
International Boxing Club of New York v. United States,
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
United States v. International ...... p boxing in the United States.
@en
label
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
United States v. International ...... D. Norris and Arthur M. Wirtz
@en