United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP - five law students from the George Washington University Law School - had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). SCRAP was the first full-court consideration of the American National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Court also reversed the lower court decision that an injunction should be issued at the suspension stage of the ICC rate proceeding. The standing decision has retained its place as the high mark in the Court's standing jurisprudence.
412 U.S. 669George_Washington_UniversityList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger CourtList of United States Supreme Court cases involving standingList of environmental lawsuitsMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencyNeil Thomas ProtoPotter StewartSaxbe fixScenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power CommissionUnited States v. SCRAPUnited States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)United States v SCRAP
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP - five law students from the George Washington University Law School - had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). SCRAP was the first full-court consideration of the American National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Court also reversed the lower court decision that an injunction should be issued at the suspension stage of the ICC rate proceeding. The standing decision has retained its place as the high mark in the Court's standing jurisprudence.
has abstract
United States v. Students Chal ...... ourt's standing jurisprudence.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
13,451,123
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,018,338,916
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures,
@en
Concurrence
Blackmun
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Marshall
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Douglas
@en
White
@en
findlaw
fullname
United States, et al. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures , et al.
@en
googlescholar
Holding
Article III "case or controver ...... ironmental Policy Act of 1969.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Brennan
@en
JoinDissent
Burger, Rehnquist
@en
JoinMajority
Brennan, Blackmun; Douglas, Marshall ; Burger, White, Rehnquist
@en
justia
LawsApplied
U.S. Constitution, Article III ...... tate Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7
@en
Litigants
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
@en
majority
Stewart
@en
NotParticipating
Powell
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
Case referred by United States ...... ; probable jurisdiction noted,
@en
Subsequent
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
United States v. Students Chal ...... ourt's standing jurisprudence.
@en
label
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
@en
미국 대 SCRAP 사건
@ko
wasDerivedFrom
name
@en
United States, et al. v. Stude ...... ncy Procedures (SCRAP), et al.
@en