Wilkinson v. Austin
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment gives rise to a liberty interest in not being placed in a Supermax prison, Ohio's procedures for determining which prisoners should be placed there satisfied the requirements of due process.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Wilkinson v. Austin
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment gives rise to a liberty interest in not being placed in a Supermax prison, Ohio's procedures for determining which prisoners should be placed there satisfied the requirements of due process.
has abstract
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. ...... e requirements of due process.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
11,033,368
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
895,905,197
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Wilkinson v. Austin,
@en
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Wilkinson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction v. Austin et al.
@en
Holding
Ohio's procedures for assignin ...... dural due process protections.
@en
JoinMajority
unanimous
@en
justia
Litigants
Wilkinson v. Austin
@en
majority
Kennedy
@en
other source
Supreme Court
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. ...... e requirements of due process.
@en
label
Wilkinson v. Austin
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Wilkinson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction v. Austin et al.
@en