Yes on Term Limits v. Savage
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage (YOTL v. Savage) is a federal lawsuit challenging Oklahoma's residency requirements for petition circulators. On December 18, 2008, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a unanimous decision in the case, saying that Oklahoma's residency restriction is an unconstitutional violation of core First Amendment speech rights. The decision of the Tenth Circuit overturns a lower federal court decision., The Tenth Circuit's decision in YOTL has attracted notice because:
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage (YOTL v. Savage) is a federal lawsuit challenging Oklahoma's residency requirements for petition circulators. On December 18, 2008, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a unanimous decision in the case, saying that Oklahoma's residency restriction is an unconstitutional violation of core First Amendment speech rights. The decision of the Tenth Circuit overturns a lower federal court decision., The Tenth Circuit's decision in YOTL has attracted notice because:
has abstract
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage ( ...... m was "no longer enforceable".
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
21,898,163
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
881,924,634
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage, No. 5:07-cv-00680, 2007 WL 2670178
@en
citations
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Yes on Term Limits, Inc., et a ...... oma Secretary of State, et al.
@en
googlescholar
JoinMajority
unanimous
@en
leagle
Litigants
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage
@en
majority
Murphy
@en
other source
Ballot-Access.org
@en
other url
Prior
No. 5:07-cv-00680, 2007 WL 2670178
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage ( ...... has attracted notice because:
@en
label
Yes on Term Limits v. Savage
@en