Yorty v. Chandler
Yorty v. Chandler,13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U.S. courts.
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Yorty v. Chandler
Yorty v. Chandler,13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel. It is a significant decision in the case law of applying the First Amendment to editorial cartoons and has been cited as a persuasive authority by other U.S. courts.
has abstract
Yorty v. Chandler,13 Cal.App.3 ...... uthority by other U.S. courts.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
56,011,352
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,003,474,614
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
citations
1970-12-15
concurring
Compton
@en
decision by
Fleming
@en
full name
Samuel W. Yorty, Plaintiff and ...... ., Defendants and Respondents.
@en
italic title
Yes
@en
judges
Fleming, Roth, Compton
@en
keywords
@en
Defamation
@en
Editorial cartoon
@en
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
@en
name
Yorty v. Chandler
@en
number of judges
opinions
Editorial cartoons necessarily ...... s the basis of a libel action.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
comment
Yorty v. Chandler,13 Cal.App.3 ...... uthority by other U.S. courts.
@en
label
Yorty v. Chandler
@en