about
Comparative reflections on the Belgian Euthanasia Act 2002Can good law make up for bad politics? The case of Eluana EnglaroThe concept of exceptionality: a legal farce?Can I access my personal genome? The current legal position in the UKHEALTH RESEARCH, DATA PROTECTION, AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN NOTIFICATIONOur Shared Vulnerability to Dangerous PathogensPublic Health Emergencies of International Concern: Global, Regional, and Local Responses to Risk.Informed consent and other fairy tales.REIMBURSEMENT OF CELL-BASED REGENERATIVE THERAPY IN THE UK AND FRANCE.Beyond pragmatism: defending the 'bright line' of birth.Learning from Cross-Border Reproduction.Assisted dying and the context of debate: 'medical law' versus 'end-of-life law'Influenza Virus Research and EU Export Regulations: Publication, Proliferation, and Pandemic Risks.Realising social justice in public health law.Religion, law and medicine: legislating on birth and death in a Christian state.Duty to warn third parties: Bradshaw v. Daniel.Liminality and the Limits of Law in Health Research Regulation: What are we Missing in the Spaces in-Between?Experiences and Motives of Australian Single Mothers by Choice Who Make Early Contact with their Child's Donor RelativesAnti-Libidinal Interventions in Sex Offenders: Medical or Correctional?Directed and conditional deceased donor organ donations: laws and misconceptions.The man of property.Medical research data-sharing: the 'public good' and vulnerable groups.Medical confidentiality and partner notification in cases of sexually transmissible infections in Belgium.Infertility treatment: access and judicial review -- R v. Sheffield Health Authority, ex parte Seale.Reporting on the persistent vegetative state in Europe.Guidelines for medical research -- some ethical and legal problems.'The necessity must be convincingly shown to exist': standards for compulsory treatment for mental disorder under the Mental Health Act 1983Nice work? Rationing, review and the 'legitimacy problem' in the new NHS.ACCESS OF SINGLE WOMEN TO FERTILITY TREATMENT: A CASE OF INCIDENTAL DISCRIMINATION?LEGAL BASES FOR DISCLOSING CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN HEALTH PROTECTION AND HEALTH IMPROVEMENT.TRUST A v X AND OTHERS: THE GHOST OF NIELSEN RETURNS?Donation of 'spare' fresh or frozen embryos to research: who decides that an embryo is 'spare' and how can we enhance the quality and protect the validity of consent?AN ASSESSMENT OF THE COURT'S ROLE IN THE WITHDRAWAL OF CLINICALLY ASSISTED NUTRITION AND HYDRATION FROM PATIENTS IN THE PERMANENT VEGETATIVE STATERISKS, REASONS AND RIGHTS: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENGLISH ABORTION LAW.Regulatory or regulating publics? The European Union's regulation of emerging health technologies and citizen participationJudicial review: low-priority treatment and exceptional case review.Re-detention after recent discharge: a role for judicial review?A DANGEROUS MUDDYING OF THE WATERS? THE 'SIGNIFICANT HARM' OF RE B AND G (CHILDREN) (CARE PROCEEDINGS)[2015] EWFC 3.BREACHING THE SEXUAL BOUNDARIES IN THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP: SHOULD ENGLISH LAW RECOGNISE FIDUCIARY DUTIES?CONVERTING THE 'RIGHT TO LIFE' TO THE 'RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA': AN ANALYSIS OF CARTER V CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL), SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
P1433
Q28242862-BE274245-FBDA-4D29-89D6-913F61039A45Q28258768-F92BE94F-7B6A-4E5C-891F-BCACEA257778Q28482120-CAE41B96-34B3-4DAE-9AFF-5C307A2F0649Q28658831-217C04D5-E1C7-4FB2-95E3-F772925608E9Q28816167-CD458F08-1FC6-4ECA-95B0-3FD466049A97Q29489674-FFBA6288-A450-4920-9034-9E939B36BBA2Q30148770-53518485-E3F3-4A3D-B765-AE37CF66EFF6Q30329929-279A0930-72F7-4EEB-A32F-3A01E2B898D9Q30355329-1B211936-A93E-48C3-AD5C-9A94BE576E31Q30362908-EC72D8DC-0B0A-4781-AD34-55DC12981C50Q30377604-B5027D98-0AFB-4DB8-974C-618EBB4082E2Q30396519-C677481B-3992-4AC8-9465-75D3FD36893BQ30397876-71A4BE04-2AED-4C5A-9ABE-EBED6F96EA51Q30423127-F9856122-D334-4A20-9E9F-5DA9C87402DEQ31084267-7A28D414-5E60-48F5-B5A3-4D9ADF1B96B6Q33184013-DAE89AE4-1B2C-42BA-94C2-2C332A364D75Q33552257-BD8C49D2-9827-42A5-9D15-6364C2DA7BAEQ33554051-32BF2DDF-47E7-44E3-88FA-62BE40BEE0E3Q33554056-ACAF082A-375F-436C-AA4F-2CF181ED38B6Q34082778-D7F7FC80-303F-4154-BD5E-3704801CC018Q34098358-ED46FA81-F68C-428B-9561-1A750AEA3222Q34231545-25B2FF5B-91EB-4E87-8670-965172A9ACE0Q34323491-A3EDFFA7-30D2-4D22-83E0-7C5B6582449BQ34412226-AFB73A93-7F64-403E-BDD8-182D4748B1E1Q34412271-5CB54FF5-03F6-4CB9-8EF6-02D6460B2168Q34413307-4A2CEA1C-D8F0-4917-940D-24E0D14A54A4Q35559284-99B62AE8-4EF5-4BAC-975D-49E75FFEB030Q35674810-C40E4D63-27A2-42C5-A9B2-55521F539CEAQ35736743-9202A843-A22B-42A6-BA28-6759535A9325Q35944468-F5FDA67B-D8CE-4563-9A33-0CC4DCB6CB04Q36044332-41732248-F560-422B-8500-EDD8AD9E85DCQ36148674-EF4DF763-A8E1-410A-89CD-E95D64B2133DQ36258332-2E038D91-093E-46D1-B690-F196E7B58295Q36567065-EBCD60C4-6B4B-412B-8607-5DE1D61F2E1BQ36617663-2DC0A1AA-5289-4784-9F0A-FE2A041FBFB7Q36823180-8261053E-7101-4670-BB10-7E8DC5A97221Q36828452-ECE36970-2BB7-447B-AC22-326F5E592B03Q37023351-1EC64B45-597B-40C0-B55D-BF74D381B29CQ37023359-EAF6CFD3-7CCC-466D-8BA9-8B2A09B4867DQ37023364-437FD589-3CB6-4B8F-9A11-037767CCDFBB
P1433
description
journal
@en
مجلة
@ar
name
Medical Law Review
@da
Medical Law Review
@en
Medical Law Review
@fi
Medical Law Review
@fr
Medical Law Review
@nb
Medical Law Review
@nn
Medical Law Review
@sv
type
label
Medical Law Review
@da
Medical Law Review
@en
Medical Law Review
@fi
Medical Law Review
@fr
Medical Law Review
@nb
Medical Law Review
@nn
Medical Law Review
@sv
prefLabel
Medical Law Review
@da
Medical Law Review
@en
Medical Law Review
@fi
Medical Law Review
@fr
Medical Law Review
@nb
Medical Law Review
@nn
Medical Law Review
@sv
P3181
P1055
P1058
P1156
P1277
P1476
Medical Law Review
@en