Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
about
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelinesUpper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?Can the presence of endoscopic high-risk stigmata be predicted before endoscopy? A multivariable analysis using the RUGBE database.Validation of the Rockall scoring system for outcomes from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Canadian setting.Consensus guidelines on quantifying HIV-related oral mucosal disease.Dieulafoy's lesion: a case series studyProposed risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: is hospitalisation essential?Management of haematemesis and melaenaClinical characteristics of Helicobacter pylori-negative drug-negative peptic ulcer bleedingUse of the Complete Rockall Score and the Forrest Classification to Assess Outcome in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Subject to After-hours Endoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Current management of peptic ulcer bleeding.Defining Appropriate Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Among Medical Inpatients.Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleedingRockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleedingPredicting outcome of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage without endoscopy using the clinical Rockall Score.Endoscopic management of refractory gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding using Histoacryl (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) glue.The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and the multidimensional approach. A new look at the older patient with gastroenterological disorders.Chronic kidney disease, hemodynamic instability, and endoscopic high-risk appearance are associated with 30-day rebleeding in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Clinical Risk Characteristics of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity: A Multivariable Risk AnalysisGastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity Triage: Locally Derived Score May Outperform Existing Scoring Systems.Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Validation of the Severity Score.Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Development of the Severity Score.Absence of Helicobacter pylori is not protective against peptic ulcer bleeding in elderly on offending agents: lessons from an exceptionally low prevalence population.Modern management of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.The Importance of Rockall Scoring System for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Long-Term Follow-Up.A randomized comparative trial of OTSC and Padlock for upper GI hemostasis in a standardized experimental setting.Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Decreasing trend of upper gastrointestinal bleeding mortality risk over three decades.Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.Do medicine residents triage patients with gastrointestinal bleeding appropriately?Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal HemorrhageUpdate on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.[Classification and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding].Preadmission use of SSRIs alone or in combination with NSAIDs and 30-day mortality after peptic ulcer bleeding.Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
P2860
Q24685894-FBA6AE44-B4C9-4111-AEF1-4A259D9636E4Q26766658-1D637C33-300D-49E9-BE2F-B21E88D1D30EQ33810966-E13B37E6-11A5-4F81-A04A-09854A4CDC0EQ33866685-F5E8E8DA-F943-42AE-9316-FA34B6C3350BQ34775207-86EB288C-70B0-453D-B604-18D198F46777Q35045257-46630FA9-3DAD-426F-8077-5CD9A9E9928BQ35557502-F0B2E275-445B-496D-84F0-76CB763E4FEAQ35836655-0E6F9664-7F56-46A8-B6B9-7F49862DA2BBQ35891415-311B10E1-D906-47B0-8C99-E658E6505160Q36306379-70234EE6-1B8A-469A-8FB3-AA2E20A06664Q36362419-766B9C04-A51F-4CA2-AAB6-24773C270240Q36717591-90850024-32D3-4A1D-8941-27672968EF32Q36761888-06542FFC-BA0D-4913-8CB3-B259F2F1C577Q36932086-D0546880-6584-47F1-BE92-D3763B94753EQ37139595-43720689-5DD6-439B-9FC0-E69C6960E0FFQ37158135-97E6698A-B758-44E7-9563-A9D945D1C5AEQ37179227-39B9F8C2-CAC2-4FFE-BD8A-1C9262112AA0Q37225924-69776527-50C7-4458-9504-2EFE4F82E4A8Q37311587-33AA8B20-779E-4B48-8781-A67C1AAB81C6Q37311755-01A64726-32F0-4F3A-A6C9-8A3293BCC602Q37311790-0F99B486-95C6-46B8-ACDA-5458CEF6DCECQ37358348-73499E7D-E3C7-401F-9DC2-482C92F326A6Q37599504-0FF1D831-74E2-440A-90F5-93A9CAED26A6Q38127294-83FA1621-D941-4639-8F63-5FF58E839431Q38703705-8C8361A2-4F78-495B-B58A-1CE138BF5B55Q38871334-F7506DDA-4AD6-4040-ABA3-3C9F22F80D8EQ38948455-79868050-EAD6-4F9F-99B3-3841A03D7C14Q39390614-8DF5A1AF-0335-4C31-9BE5-20E4E68F763BQ39611009-066E47E7-AFB2-453E-8E04-FA0716E33BABQ40255592-00577A37-CFED-4D90-89A0-971AF8957DC5Q40356950-D04BF685-2971-4409-8D4C-8253BFB43FFBQ40675773-DF3432D6-A2F0-4B6E-BA7F-66986E547E8DQ41060093-2F44CA6F-A863-48FC-A622-5168AB691412Q41546504-5FC5504A-962F-42C0-8A05-9BE872439CF4Q41907667-20ABE7B4-93DA-4F10-92D5-3CB2C23CB308Q42771971-C0FCA32A-98F5-477E-8C42-EDE93C8849AFQ42948761-97DDBB37-20BE-4F94-B79E-1D8CE0A7E2FAQ43248032-1BC19695-A02E-4B1A-80E0-56E1A607E45CQ43271470-26B351E0-CA4B-4035-98D8-E50FE101BE0BQ44074911-1293B96F-A22C-4662-A18A-39BAB634FCAE
P2860
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@ast
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@en
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@nl
type
label
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@ast
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@en
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@nl
prefLabel
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@ast
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@en
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
@en
P2093
C B Terwee
E M Vreeburg
G N Tytgat
J F Bartelsman
J H Meulen
P2860
P356
10.1136/GUT.44.3.331
P407
P577
1999-03-01T00:00:00Z