The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24672684

about

Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States Analysis of the autoimmune epitopes on human testicular NASP using recombinant and synthetic peptides Health authority commissioning for quality in contraception services State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: III. Intrauterine devices.Preventing unintended teenage pregnancies and reducing their adverse effects.Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval.Intrauterine contraception: study to evaluate clinical practice and to increase utilization Impact of pay for performance on prescribing of long-acting reversible contraception in primary care: an interrupted time series study Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing the SILCS Diaphragm in South Africa.Prior contraceptive use among women who gave birth in the US-Mexico border region, 2005: the Brownsville-Matamoros Sister City Project for Women's Health Non-oral reversible contraceptive methods.Contraceptive use: the US perspective.Modelling cost-effectiveness of different vasectomy methods in India, Kenya, and Mexico.The use of URYX for reversible vasectomy in a rabbit model.Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.What is the actual cost of providing the intrauterine system for contraception in a UK community sexual and reproductive health setting?Predictors of men's acceptance of modern contraceptive practice: study in rural Vietnam.A qualitative study of perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of long-term levonorgestrel implant users.Is contraceptive self-injection cost-effective compared to contraceptive injections from facility-based health workers? Evidence from Uganda

P2860

Q24613481-14556EDB-3B90-48E7-8DF7-6C178C3BD3EB Q24631004-D1E02745-D610-44E1-9BC6-3DBCAB6ABDFB Q24681771-2E7E2FA3-669B-4C9C-B941-0EC084E5555D Q28385008-5902137B-F4A4-4E3F-9BB8-97E133FD14E7 Q33540807-75B8543E-877E-464E-891D-0C4391F4FBC6 Q33578698-7FF54F27-6012-480D-98A5-CC291B9C880E Q34126221-052C2FE4-603E-486C-8ABF-F8B2E071A7F6 Q34466951-D24BA69C-547E-49B4-B90B-AAD2FF2CF8F5 Q35025605-69B0DB03-19F9-497B-987B-737C550EA30A Q35138280-7D48D195-A453-4695-9973-A846537813C5 Q35752383-7C601663-960A-4238-9898-FF65F0064093 Q36962498-68FA5EA6-118C-44DE-810A-C2FB63E9D984 Q37608386-E8D63570-25BE-4D00-A892-1D324F8538E4 Q40836450-F780DB77-754E-41EC-8BE0-EFBC523E17DE Q42107992-67C1574A-278D-4488-B450-7F0D30B3F995 Q44956685-57576C1F-1117-40B0-A140-D3B7CE2174C7 Q49222352-02423287-684B-4FB4-8C05-04D72EA70EAC Q50857324-972F2ADF-CCB5-45B7-A3EC-5C92DB9E4177 Q51326264-045B99B9-23B9-4D02-8295-95462495369F Q52889848-A574B303-BF2F-4156-8032-757623F70B94 Q56910623-9D0716D9-80DC-4D41-8356-F68381846575

P2860

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24672684

description

1995 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

1995 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

1995 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

1995年の論文

@ja

1995年学术文章

@wuu

1995年学术文章

@zh-cn

1995年学术文章

@zh-hans

1995年学术文章

@zh-my

1995年学术文章

@zh-sg

1995年學術文章

@yue

name

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@ast

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@en

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@nl

type

label

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@ast

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@en

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@nl

prefLabel

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@ast

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@en

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@nl

P1433

Q24672684-6C5E04A0-3FDC-4F2A-93D7-1D69A7625647

P1476

Q24672684-6AABC548-61A5-476B-8D18-A5C37C692913

P2093

Q24672684-324E156A-CF5A-4CF7-BB47-9C8A01C7D7B0

Q24672684-527A57BB-E095-4010-8993-D021F09E2E36

Q24672684-9047AE08-1088-4EF5-8AAB-6AE636CD7801

Q24672684-96DAF4CD-9627-40E8-9162-9E5008EAAF90

Q24672684-9A5526B9-797A-4E24-AB1A-A2B498D63B95

Q24672684-BC837E87-0DFE-4787-8B6C-7379C5B32800

Q24672684-C531A85E-AEC7-4DB2-808F-FE6E51E8F6F0

Q24672684-D4911E2C-CBC8-43D7-8B90-53B3D9BB52E2

Q24672684-D8B958D2-0187-40F1-85DD-BE26A158CB13

Q24672684-F020A0E3-418A-4C84-9D54-C1C75DB6F858

P2860

Q24672684-15841FFF-C273-4623-BB4B-7FFEA2ABB42A

Q24672684-373D0BDD-5586-407E-80C5-5640BDEBBB43

Q24672684-56B29B20-937F-45CC-A471-DACC9CC51E5D

Q24672684-5AF0CA26-F989-46C4-8B6A-93BD69421330

Q24672684-769FEB49-7F57-4B4E-8ECD-2FEC4B53AA16

Q24672684-957AC7F0-6285-4E59-80B0-2BB3680480BB

Q24672684-99D38C6C-A182-4347-868D-A18D09587482

Q24672684-A45CDC00-3C9B-4CFE-BA0B-26F29AB7980D

Q24672684-C88D53FB-028F-4866-9D06-8CDCAA16E56E

Q24672684-EC1CC188-321A-459A-B9A9-DA8E704ADE0E

P304

Q24672684-E0BED262-1591-4085-84FE-3D894774E484

P31

Q24672684-43DEC5D7-BB31-4346-A66E-A16071CBB4BD

P356

Q24672684-2AD13EEE-91A3-48EE-8982-CAB0A899ACC4

P407

Q24672684-F423BA9A-EBD7-431D-A36D-D05ACE793325

P433

Q24672684-B8C4DE36-17AF-4521-A58E-97A7C82AE012

P478

Q24672684-8105C832-384F-472C-9796-95001F933A8A

P577

Q24672684-F21C7BDB-A5C2-44DD-8FCD-03D9CE9299E4

P5875

Q24672684-BE52CB9B-40BF-4E33-B18C-7E583F13D8CA

P698

Q24672684-661D1E5E-5A08-4E73-9BEB-B07DC1648398

P921

Q24672684-2DCF3402-28A9-4773-BC7E-D82EF760D334

P932

Q24672684-64274A37-823A-4EC7-BAC2-A9EF5B8A648F

P356

P1433

American Journal of Public Health

P1476

The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods

@en

P2093

F Stewart

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J A Leveque

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J D Koenig

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Henneberry

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Trussell

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

K D LaGuardia

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

R London

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S Borden

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S Wysocki

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

T G Wilson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The Accessibility of Abortion Services in the United States

Efficacy of the simultaneous use of condoms and spermicides

The effectiveness of postcoital hormonal contraception.

Worldwide variations in the lifetime probability of reproductive cancer in women: implications of best-case, worst-case, and likely-case assumptions about the effect of oral contraceptive use.

The lifetime cost of treating a person with HIV.

Oral contraceptives and reproductive cancers: weighing the risks and benefits.

The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982-1988.

Abortion services in the United States, 1991 and 1992.

Tubal sterilization: findings in a large prospective study.

Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.

P304

494-503

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.2105/AJPH.85.4.494

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

85

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

1995-04-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

15497277

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

7702112

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

1615115

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string