New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
about
Transforming Epidemiology for 21st Century Medicine and Public HealthKnowledge Integration in Cancer: Current Landscape and Future ProspectsData resource profile: cardiovascular disease research using linked bespoke studies and electronic health records (CALIBER)Biobanks and personalized medicineSustaining Research Networks: the Twenty-Year Experience of the HMO Research NetworkNewspaper coverage of biobanksImproving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocolsSample and data sharing: observations from a central data repositoryBiobanking: The Melding of Research with Clinical CareRelationship between use of general practice and healthcare costs at the end of life: a data linkage study in New South Wales, Australia.Digital Connectedness in the Framingham Heart Study.Comparison of sample characteristics in two pregnancy cohorts: community-based versus population-based recruitment methods.The 'cognitive footprint' of psychiatric and neurological conditions: cross-sectional study in the UK Biobank cohort."Collection of a lifetime: a practical approach to developing a longitudinal collection of women's healthcare biological samples".How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?Biobanking across the phenome - at the center of chronic disease researchA platform for the remote conduct of gene-environment interaction studies.Translational cancer research: balancing prevention and treatment to combat cancer globally.Invited commentary: future of population studies--defining research priorities and processes.How Does Cardiovascular Disease First Present in Women and Men? Incidence of 12 Cardiovascular Diseases in a Contemporary Cohort of 1,937,360 PeopleRecruitment strategies in a prospective longitudinal family study on parents with obesity and their toddlers.Protocol for the China PEACE (Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) Million Persons Project pilot.Collecting Biospecimens From an Internet-Based Prospective Cohort Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CCFA Partners): A Feasibility Study.The hallmarks of premalignant conditions: a molecular basis for cancer preventionCounterpoint: "streamlined" does not mean simple.Vehement agreement on new models?Pregnancy recruitment for population research: the National Children's Study vanguard experience in Wayne County, Michigan.Minimum Cost Estimation of a Baseline Survey for a Molecular Epidemiology Cohort Study: Collecting Participants in a Model Region in Japan.Research ethics in the post-genomic era.Effectiveness of individual-focused interventions to prevent chronic disease.Comparison of Recruitment Strategy Outcomes in the National Children's Study.Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants with the General Population.The American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study 3 (CPS-3): Recruitment, study design, and baseline characteristics.Point: is there a future for innovative epidemiology?Socioeconomic status and anthropometric changes-A meta-analytic approach from seven German cohorts.Re: New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?Healthy Cities of Tomorrow: the Case for Large Scale Built Environment-Health Studies.Cohort studies with low baseline response may not be generalisable to populations with different exposure distributions.Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores.New models for large prospective studies: is there a risk of throwing out the baby with the bathwater?
P2860
Q24289006-0309CAC7-A339-4DD6-814D-AAE5143474A4Q24289007-9A9D1706-0BF7-4691-9CD0-CE93E006CF43Q24289188-4391B242-47E0-4D18-A056-9BB524A6195FQ26866132-9FAFED62-CA0D-49DF-9D35-5693B161DA60Q28651796-5126146F-BA98-4A4B-AA5B-BA271AA8EB7DQ28654959-84C747A7-BB95-4D05-8942-55355304BD2BQ28655983-5B64B1D9-5E51-4A6E-86B9-3177359FE386Q28657577-CDA9810A-CEFB-4BAD-8D65-9A7DC181E634Q28662280-8FCF1C80-AFA9-4EAA-85DD-878BC444DA3CQ31035873-64A1F241-26A3-40BE-AF65-A5CEB972ABC5Q33448211-61E53C01-5A01-48A9-9A6D-F223AC2136F3Q33642654-7C5A8895-5593-4DF2-A760-184D77636EA9Q33697903-0ECD881B-31DB-44CC-ACB3-FF302894D26AQ34103883-4805DE56-E096-4B81-A7DB-0EB471DFB185Q34327946-5D08FC57-8884-4412-9CF8-C839A5BC0834Q34464473-55171368-1BA2-4BA6-A785-089F45C57C91Q34562920-0511C4DC-F8EB-41E9-91D6-F3A380F213CCQ35102711-48D5DD54-6B8E-43F8-84A4-AFC462130118Q35233969-AE0DC3F5-F0CE-499B-926D-7BDE48ACEA92Q36111367-122C8D82-A25D-4A68-BB57-92941888ED14Q36265587-2AAEA05E-C935-49A0-8DB7-7A8E0BBBCA5DQ36472148-2B876273-993F-411D-8FAB-0799E02C69FBQ36480443-7C601F7C-2B6C-40E7-AEC1-FF02F4F9FDD2Q36679858-E07A5AE9-007F-4883-9AB6-8B29EF552A25Q36764950-5ADC3BC1-32CC-4D52-B92E-4B02857A917AQ36764957-ACF3FB33-F0F7-47B4-873B-DC64F543B2B8Q36904545-2EABADB6-E757-462A-8814-74F6EE8B7D69Q37284906-2B3865CD-31D3-4F45-B000-6B0CCFA64C5EQ38125958-93E14720-A8AB-4F94-BF7B-E99D6B7CAEE9Q38231641-D3DD1D27-AB0D-4254-AE87-0549B6C09617Q38654972-AC993FAE-8775-4547-9D4C-2866044C9E3DQ38713566-92142F62-F7F3-4CE0-84E6-3C86036A2683Q38974016-E86B9DE8-A7F8-46BC-93BA-A5A8A9151E06Q39490064-5A40D743-5425-4DF4-ADB2-D13963FCA62FQ40034655-20529F80-A2B7-4F36-90C5-52D980A65812Q42573895-B0A5E191-0C7F-4063-A2AE-664A31E2A8FBQ43591793-AB93A4D9-BDD3-41B3-92A6-7D480F740CF1Q44843388-F1417F40-CA8A-4336-9529-F24D998B5897Q47161643-13C18D9E-8D71-46A9-AD24-DEE8B52E2E52Q50882044-11025F32-B27F-4841-B3FC-4C7D3124A8B3
P2860
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@ast
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@en
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@nl
type
label
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@ast
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@en
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@nl
prefLabel
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@ast
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@en
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P3181
P356
P1476
New models for large prospective studies: is there a better way?
@en
P2093
Alpa V Patel
Barnett S Kramer
Brenda K Weis
Catherine C Cowie
Catherine Schaefer
Chris Berg
Daniel Masys
J Michael Gaziano
Joan A Scott
John McLaughlin
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1093/AJE/KWR453
P407
P577
2012-05-01T00:00:00Z