Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
about
Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training InterventionsReplication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychologyResearchers' Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research.Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibilityProgress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscienceEvaluating Psychological Research Requires More Than Attention to the N.From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey.Predicting Ideological Prejudice.Going in Many Right Directions, All at Once.Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools.Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study.Minimal intervention delivered by 2-1-1 information and referral specialists promotes smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a Texas generalisation trial.Revisiting the revisit: added evidence for a social chemosignal in human emotional tearsReproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?Reliability of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A user survey.Commentary: Reproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?Perception Science in the Age of Deep Neural Networks.Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.A Systems Approach to Understanding and Improving Research Integrity.From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology.The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).The "Wallpaper Effect" Revisited: Divergent Findings on the Effects of Intergroup Contact on Attitudes in Diverse Versus Nondiverse Contexts.Promoting Transparent Reporting of Conflicts of Interests and Statistical Analyses at The Journal of Sex Research.Another step towards scientific transparency: Requiring research materials for publication.Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research.Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studiesAddressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.Each Reader Decides if a Replication Counts.Statistical Power Analysis and the contemporary “crisis” in social sciencesPsychology’s reproducibility problem is exaggerated – say psychologists
P2860
Q24273355-380ECB60-B8FD-4BC8-9C2C-0F0FFE98551CQ24658643-B20C8282-2169-4008-AB8A-A675EAF6E8CFQ27324368-9F0AD7C9-8F23-46DA-8A71-F977DDC7DE47Q28597738-C4FBD3A9-D4BA-458D-986D-8E6CD2975B11Q29994537-FAD17E4F-ACE4-45DF-A092-CEE23AFEF333Q30276025-984BAB2A-E069-40A9-A548-63FB6D64959FQ30490232-603C8F52-D8B3-4730-AFA4-4D08513B7762Q30491362-654287DB-7C76-49CE-AAD0-BB0C91D9CD43Q33365749-0741044C-8517-4F45-BEE9-8F71FC3C5F9EQ33760407-247A4616-27A6-4961-A038-AC212EBAAA78Q36339852-170FCF1D-DE89-433E-9C7F-6FD50AA57346Q37398984-9DB5819C-89B9-45CF-9396-6A6796C3CB25Q37560406-27BCC193-02AB-4206-A343-F30942A420E5Q38720122-CFEAC427-E720-4C60-A1C3-7E8F51C0E817Q38947211-809F6BCF-DF86-4EAD-B74F-00948AE95859Q41073043-5E4FBF87-D04F-47CF-9C58-CE51F01AE2C9Q42324618-AC15B451-A534-4920-B241-78BCA83D1EBFQ42692330-A99E89E1-A096-402E-8B3A-A472958EA75CQ42699271-2B05A097-A7F4-4EAC-8C09-7BC06AC6A0E0Q47100579-CF32F37A-65F7-4C63-B13C-E9D0C63D92FFQ47396479-DC1FCF5F-511D-4289-B5A0-C41F0908D0E0Q47990416-2C28C681-2C0D-4218-A41A-26124FA46892Q49923416-B238BA7E-D072-481B-9784-6250D92788A4Q49945385-672EAF1D-203D-46B0-BBA2-6F9132C7EBD9Q50047205-6FBFD098-BBF0-4FBB-A980-91A659341AA0Q50111076-AAC00E90-DCCA-460B-80A0-D2C5E53E28ADQ50680976-29E9E8CA-CC3C-413B-9DA4-207643D38681Q54404316-30B0DB06-48C6-49EB-B898-07C67B50740DQ57569063-05A43FEB-A39C-4ECD-98C9-E72B130AED50Q74441293-CC6FA6D7-0408-45AB-A751-B1B364EAC4AC
P2860
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2016 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
name
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@ast
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@en
type
label
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@ast
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@en
prefLabel
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@ast
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@en
P2093
P2860
P3181
P356
P1433
P1476
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
@en
P2093
D. T. Gilbert
S. Pettigrew
T. D. Wilson
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1126/SCIENCE.AAD7243
P407
P577
2016-03-03T00:00:00Z