Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
about
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective EnterpriseA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewPromote scientific integrity via journal peer review data.The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help?A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trialsIncreasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network.Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians.Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials.Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.Developing Your Expertise as a Peer Reviewer.Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groupsThe state of the art in peer reviewEditors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative studyUptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
P2860
Q27886969-E56EA22A-4574-4D84-8851-7A41CC77D5B9Q33269085-0E6C74CC-718F-40D2-8CF5-E0843EB626BBQ38669101-74032116-D3D2-44D2-A0F9-30C7775A04BCQ39264517-2296C71D-3CE1-43AC-AB64-907BD8C036C4Q42376867-8225D0D5-27AF-432D-A36C-0E40ACE112A4Q42385678-12FC4682-0E39-49C2-A243-2D68753F5DF1Q42698230-D74ED720-768C-4905-BE47-3FA3F377099AQ42698469-4458D995-2769-45C5-84A9-4B04DC2FD7EAQ46275850-58BFAD3F-9DA5-4331-99D0-DBCB04F63E60Q47560836-7E5E58BD-F909-469A-BBBF-21A4C57B84ADQ49959095-7CF12B8A-4C1A-47BB-A9EC-881FB563CA96Q54839271-7F1BD7A4-30B8-4B07-A02F-E6CB803146A4Q55042480-395AAE8F-6DD3-49E2-AEB0-22F932BB27F5Q57179406-C8CD784F-D904-49A1-A662-FFB95541A635Q57554278-54A7DAE9-6375-47B4-8494-DCCE8E5CCE3DQ57812103-1B37217A-7422-4EAA-AE82-18EAF5C897C5Q58771876-011014F6-CE3F-4C97-9603-AA43E257FDEB
P2860
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2016 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
name
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@ast
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@en
type
label
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@ast
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@en
prefLabel
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@ast
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@en
P2860
P31
P50
P921
P1433
P1476
Impact of interventions to imp ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@en
P2093
Rachel Bruce
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/S12916-016-0631-5
P407
P577
2016-06-10T00:00:00Z
P6179
1010984263