about
Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directionsSystems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the fieldThe judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment.Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention designed to increase the use of research in health policy and program organisations (the SPIRIT study).The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU).Changing policy framing as a deliberate strategy for public health advocacy: a qualitative policy case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol.How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in londonResearch and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health.Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.Type, frequency and purpose of information used to inform public health policy and program decision-makingGalvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchersPatient choice and evidence based decisions: The case of complementary therapies.Translating policy into practice: a case study in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.The role of the Sheffield model on the minimum unit pricing of alcohol debate: the importance of a rhetorical perspective.Implementing a Public Health Objective for Alcohol Premises Licensing in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of Strategies, Values, and Perceptions of Evidence.The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines.Evaluation models and evaluation use.Thinking about think tanks in health care: a call for a new research agenda.Making the most of evaluation: a mixed methods study in the English NHS.Commentary: Moving towards policy coherence in trade and health.Male circumcision for protection against HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence in favour justifies the implementation now in progress.Financial sustainability versus access and quality in a challenged health system: an examination of the capitation policy debate in Ghana.What constitutes high performance in priority setting and resource allocation? Decision maker narratives identified from a survey and qualitative study in Canadian healthcare organizations.Exploring the interpersonal-, organization-, and system-level factors that influence the implementation and use of an innovation-synoptic reporting-in cancer care.Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in CanadaMental health service system improvement: translating evidence into policy.The many meanings of evidence: a comparative analysis of the forms and roles of evidence within three health policy processes in Cambodia.Being 'rational' and being 'human': How National Health Service rationing decisions are constructed as rational by resource allocation panels.Policymakers' experience of a capacity-building intervention designed to increase their use of research: a realist process evaluation.When policy meets the personal: general practice nurses in Australia.Does engagement predict research use? An analysis of The Conversation Annual Survey 2016.Policy is political; our ideas about knowledge translation must be too.The social negotiation of fitness for work: tensions in doctor-patient relationships over medical certification of chronic pain.Reaching the parts that other theories and methods can't reach: how and why a policy-as-discourse approach can inform health-related policy.What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers' capacity to use research? A realist scoping review.Improving interpretation of publically reported statistics on health and healthcare: the Figure Interpretation Assessment Tool (FIAT-Health).Response to ‘The Appropriation of Complexity Theory in Health Care’Exchanging knowledge through healthcare manager placements in research teamsThe values and ethical commitments of doctors engaging in macroallocation: a qualitative and evaluative analysis
P2860
Q24658167-5DD3D694-B56E-4285-BD93-71A559277B96Q28074101-FDA3C850-2F90-4B7D-9AB5-80E464CAE7C2Q30424605-9EE94E02-1537-4A51-832E-B181A6965479Q30596833-857D0DC7-9178-4DF6-A51B-B3A72F09D98DQ33507179-790BDD3F-4000-460D-8321-1A658B61672CQ33872177-61AC9A92-4F23-4B0D-B1E7-E48082F48484Q33896512-6FBC5F6B-9D7D-4B91-AC49-224DD9309159Q33922639-A7A4285F-596D-45F3-A118-87C0F8968EADQ34566629-1567B290-69E2-401D-BB0D-A4978188631DQ35440406-D96F6E5D-0498-484D-AB6F-624F02F0BF2EQ35649373-14C87D83-C107-476F-8B49-44C24D6F29C6Q37332451-57532B96-D89F-44AF-AC72-8F54B6ED1CC7Q37333071-1336996A-BFC7-4CD5-A55F-40DF102DFD2AQ37592105-75BB95D2-1EC5-406E-B018-32000CE7FE0BQ37724419-AC4D55B0-0708-4BC2-B1BE-7503C049BA43Q37949401-25BE0663-549C-422A-BE17-75ABDF7B4228Q38092774-65E35654-4FDC-4241-94AF-D2A5153CCE7AQ38151153-6E99B33F-84A6-4E5C-8445-B185CB5736D4Q39425464-392D5EF8-3CE2-483A-B514-1BE91572A836Q39570848-A8141236-59A1-4D23-9F88-CF95B00C6053Q39571729-AE3ADAA9-E101-4B17-B16B-39A83721C2A0Q39766790-189AB7F8-7C84-4E96-95AE-99A38D70CD19Q41573422-34714D5E-1135-4D20-BC51-CB1137209C62Q41889815-14FE80C3-BC51-4466-BE4F-92F60CC60D0EQ41925819-0CBC79E0-961B-44F4-A29F-9D5DF98D65ACQ43585430-E2EA261E-E5A7-411E-B998-637CCFF26BE8Q44450639-964448E0-E6B6-4B0E-9904-8705B78656A7Q46008826-CF717B41-95D8-4388-85CC-1FC219248098Q47136743-B11EB9E5-C482-4618-9728-FC77CDEC0FE0Q48227540-4F9F8ECD-4EAD-4F0A-BF7A-33F69C7A74FBQ49926322-D525907F-669C-4FF6-8353-C008971DBC26Q51822431-4D79FB95-928A-4A83-A79A-DA86825CC051Q51835619-A39615C8-0791-4A10-84B8-785D1FFA2677Q51914727-EFB848E3-A10E-44F0-BB81-3D9D666CB59FQ55020549-BD1DC95A-A1A5-4EC4-8431-8807FB58824AQ55312598-58EA37F9-6A0C-46C8-88EF-CE3F67E4B0E2Q57270480-46997E82-A7FC-4281-A76C-2AC0AE40F179Q58030651-77658841-1A1D-4B3C-B3D9-24CD8FAB99C3Q58657299-BF7D3C97-4CCA-4B86-80FF-671DB03E220F
P2860
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@ast
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@en
type
label
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@ast
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@ast
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis.
@en
P2093
Emma Byrne
Janet McDonnell
Jill Russell
P2860
P356
10.1258/JHSRP.2007.006029
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z