Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?
about
Improving Patient Outcomes in Gynecology: The Role of Large Data Registries and Big Data Analytics.An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infections in obstetric and gynecological surgeries from a teaching hospital in rural India.Risk of surgical site infection, acute kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection following antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin plus a beta-lactam versus either drug alone: A national propensity-score-adjusted retrospective cohort study.Do patients with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes have different risks for complications after arthroplasty?The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology proceduresMorbidity of urologic surgical procedures: an analysis of rates, risk factors, and outcomes.Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery.Perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety IndicatorsDevelopment and testing of tools to detect ambulatory surgical adverse events.The impact of peri-operative blood transfusions on post-pancreatectomy short-term outcomes: an analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Assessing readmission after general, vascular, and thoracic surgery using ACS-NSQIP.The relationship between relative value units and outcomes: a multivariate analysis of plastic surgery proceduresMajor postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction tool.Maternal postoperative complications after nonobstetric antenatal surgery.Morbidity of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in pregnant and nonpregnant women.Venous Thromboembolism in Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.The impact of blood transfusion on perioperative outcomes following gastric cancer resection: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseSurgical site infection after hysterectomyExcess costs attributable to postoperative complications.Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymphadenectomy in patients treated with lumpectomy: an analysis of short-term outcomes.Predictors of adverse events after parotidectomy: a review of 2919 cases.Derivation, Validation and Application of a Pragmatic Risk Prediction Index for Benchmarking of Surgical Outcomes.Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: greatest benefit for the frail.A validated, risk assessment tool for predicting readmission after open ventral hernia repair.Complications Associated with Mortality after Head and Neck Surgery.Assessing safety and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: a propensity score matched analysis of 16,370 patients.An Online Tool for Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes.Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.Minimally invasive surgery and its impact on 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions and mortality.The impact of resident involvement on otolaryngology surgical outcomes.The Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes After Major Surgery: Results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005-2011.Risk factors for unplanned readmissions following excisional breast surgery.Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: is the glass half empty or more than 99% full?Limitations of patient-associated co-morbidity model in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic operations.Trends and risk factors for transfusion in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.30-day adverse event rates following penile prosthesis surgery: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program based evaluation.The impact of advanced age on short-term outcomes following gastric cancer resection: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.Frailty Correlates with Postoperative Mortality and Major Morbidity After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.
P2860
Q30488152-3103B7AC-97D9-496A-A60F-ACBF8A38CBEDQ30939263-135B8478-497A-4B3A-A57B-E635D2AD05F4Q33801432-B99C86C8-6DDC-4155-B0FF-81986D8476DFQ33887897-C88A4AD9-C583-41B5-B1FE-14C6E56779E3Q34276903-E92EC2FB-36F8-486E-BAB8-CCE445270121Q34435999-C69D8DF9-AF4F-4A89-8F45-F7D9A2BD1446Q35146633-4B059AD9-133C-490C-B3E8-D138E49058C4Q35227289-7AE32160-B87E-46E8-B768-852D5684724DQ35822490-B6753087-4467-46BB-B86B-C209CDE375B0Q36020028-200E0CB8-4AF9-41D4-B928-272760B60237Q36027192-69E69F4C-87F4-4D22-9235-E80150F02985Q36160746-E6752F98-3C05-47AB-A1F7-47FBB3F8DA5DQ36216075-4D61A84A-788E-479C-AB4D-B24DD42502BBQ36507241-5E9A43BE-BFDF-45F4-8002-6327334C1693Q36781635-5E94C84D-D10A-4C3C-BE9F-0C0B1A1A4D76Q36942340-41B0E0FE-F323-46BC-BB89-7BF168AADF49Q36984212-D460C6C1-DAB6-486B-94D1-E879C31B5367Q37029813-415B5C18-EB2D-4681-8720-8C88C5DFBA69Q37297382-3280D11A-3B9D-44C5-9A70-AFBE45EB6AF3Q37302912-B255F8D8-B9AE-4908-B0BB-7245B873A38FQ37871201-262B60C8-7272-4FDB-9C30-C6BA2004943AQ38138889-14EEB63F-7CB9-4838-9C1B-757245F9BEEDQ38228630-544A0D05-6721-4F97-942A-0B9F59DD7C82Q38631181-0C4FF874-E4A0-4FE4-86A9-1C5F03CEC0E2Q38792538-0BDEE30F-51BF-4F3A-8BCB-C7D3ADEE4D4DQ38972988-3E5C7439-98A8-494F-90F9-9F85DA05A14DQ39002663-53BD62D8-AEE0-4F42-8504-DAA6BAD09B06Q39189884-295026F4-E031-4BA3-8282-5C8E76B5D581Q39549702-36DF69D9-BC4A-4696-9434-EEE34899FF8BQ39604699-97964F17-9A82-47B5-9E1E-496450AA10E0Q40152830-52648071-D9CA-4C01-8065-28A0147FF033Q40364563-1DBB6880-4545-48E7-9852-5B48C2B93535Q40852676-7887F3B2-5B68-42EF-A379-5E24C2B7E4C0Q42221125-B0FC6593-21CE-4CFA-A44F-A1186E44E413Q42228733-CBB31D5D-2AC2-42EA-B79B-829A7CC027FBQ44470002-5E99B3B2-9369-4667-B748-3DD33AB4370AQ46572619-7B2AD780-4141-413C-B2E4-09BA32A7A23FQ47136534-90835048-40BB-400C-B4DE-F423BF19FED9Q47326034-5E41CE56-7EBC-4149-B192-CF819B13A462Q47567434-037C6D6A-BF07-4036-9571-93A0B537A54F
P2860
Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@ast
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@en
type
label
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@ast
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@en
prefLabel
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@ast
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@en
P1476
Design and statistical methodo ...... Program: why is it what it is?
@en
P2093
Jennifer Daley
William G Henderson
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2009.07.025
P407
P433
P577
2009-11-01T00:00:00Z