Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30543371

about

Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.Interest in genomic SNP testing for prostate cancer risk: a pilot survey.Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives.Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.Health care professionals' attitudes towards population-based genetic testing and risk-stratification for ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

P2860

Q34859653-4BCD5D82-3F20-45B3-91D8-0A509DC0EE35 Q35403712-76186299-ECB3-48B4-BF7D-8097CC46A2CB Q35784347-C4BF02F7-11FD-40D4-91A3-98D337F01082 Q36229139-5B0C1E2D-9C64-4CCF-9886-7E7B63EC61A8 Q37711233-461A8CD0-E4D6-4964-ABBC-9143CAAFCFDE Q38745230-506C6116-4745-4C0A-A63E-10C76EE00186 Q47110015-6340E1A1-BB76-4684-9950-B0593D6DDEC3

P2860

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30543371

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@ast

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@en

type

label

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@ast

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@en

prefLabel

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@ast

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@en

P1433

Q30543371-5EC47177-6E79-4A73-A458-E593DAD292FA

P1476

Q30543371-29151DF8-8C16-4E24-9FE2-DF2406F8EE14

P2093

Q30543371-12AFD0AC-D062-4DA7-A21A-A6117E810096

Q30543371-12C812E0-9199-46BE-A7D8-77A8EA708B7D

Q30543371-14F72592-E4BA-47AC-BF6A-8BC2848671BC

Q30543371-2029289D-1B80-4C10-925E-5388F194EA75

Q30543371-4EDF9B6E-7F1E-4C95-8D1B-DF03021720B8

Q30543371-557E68BC-B9A1-4F7F-843E-D48F660FD863

Q30543371-84EBD825-BC2D-4906-89AD-D9857DB5428C

Q30543371-A30E7047-DB21-4CCC-9906-44D5A0FC28F1

P2860

Q30543371-04E9BF43-E1C2-415C-A6DC-68FAECC1285F

Q30543371-0A6030F9-9C2E-48EF-A421-D59293E4B67E

Q30543371-0A90A2DF-E8A0-496F-A538-3CAA7EF3152B

Q30543371-0ADCF69B-CDD1-47F1-B888-221BE3E43F9F

Q30543371-0FE87105-7255-4A0B-983D-6A7283816C7A

Q30543371-140EAD3D-37EA-4B46-8F1D-3FB134449494

Q30543371-1563C366-4DF9-408B-8CD6-9AED5241877E

Q30543371-250FA719-EE72-4E1E-B400-AB725ECF592D

Q30543371-2E3DFE5E-DFC0-4C3A-A275-2A75D97D3B26

Q30543371-367BC448-EAE9-4CC6-A774-97C76D41C2C0

P2888

Q30543371-362C3BA2-5841-49ED-B195-52EB1BE0401E

P304

Q30543371-EC430822-810D-4F08-B863-975FC4153803

P31

Q30543371-D03E04B5-B230-4925-9716-0251CD0F49A5

P356

Q30543371-4AADB12F-5BAA-4613-BFF1-129797292225

P478

Q30543371-4273DA0E-EB55-4D81-BBB6-2316FD82BCDD

P577

Q30543371-23E9CB5E-87E0-45A7-B912-B0CA5663418B

P5875

Q30543371-8EAB2D38-4791-442B-8750-2E3B9AD9DD26

P6179

Q30543371-8302D483-C8B6-41E7-B624-8A6A1F4FB3F1

P698

Q30543371-D56EEB26-7C5D-45E5-BA2D-4EF1732A67FF

P932

Q30543371-42DF37E1-047D-4E99-B0AD-B57BE58EAEC5

P356

1472-6963-13-279

P1433

BMC Health Services Research

P1476

Patient and provider attitudes ...... ibility: a mixed method study.

@en

P2093

Anita Y Kinney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Christopher Dechet

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jay Bishoff

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lisa G Aspinwall

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mary Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Neeraj Agarwal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wendy C Birmingham

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wendy Kohlmann

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy

Cancer statistics, 2012

Common genetic variation and human traits

Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.

Empiric risk of prostate carcinoma for relatives of patients with prostate carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Translational research in cancer genetics: the road less traveled

Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.

Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

P2888

1472-6963-13-279

P304

279

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/1472-6963-13-279

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

13

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-07-20T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

250921983

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1034379288

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23870420

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3750463

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string