Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
about
Hip resurfacing versus traditional total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases of the hipBalancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacementsSurgical management of hip osteoarthritisThe choice between hip prosthetic bearing surfaces in total hip replacement: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis[Influence of registries on the quality of care].Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: a study using the NJR dataset.Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients younger than 50 years: a retrospective analysis : 1285 cases, 12-year survivorship.Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologiesNew medical device regulations ahead - what does that mean for arthroplasty registers?Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions.Have cementless and resurfacing components improved the medium-term results of hip replacement for patients under 60 years of age?Femoral diameter and stem type are independent risk factors for ARMD in the large-headed ASR THR group.Method for the location of primary wear scars from retrieved metal on metal hip replacementsReducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases.What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRRCORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRRHas Metal-On-Metal Resurfacing Been a Cost-Effective Intervention for Health Care Providers?-A Registry Based Study.A Consideration of the Perspectives of Healing Practitioners on Research Into Energy HealingWhich imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both?Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28-Millimeter Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less.Good outcome of total hip replacement in patients with cerebral palsy: A comparison of 389 patients and 425,813 controls from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.Perfusion MRI in hips with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: A pilot study.Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?Peri-acetabular bone mineral densityin total hip replacementThe effect of surgical approach on the histologyof the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip: Analysis of retrieval specimensMortality rates at 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement in England: retrospective cohort analysis of hospital episode statisticsPrimary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature.The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients.Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.Explant analysis of the Biomet Magnum/ReCap metal-on-metal hip joint.Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?Orthopaedic implant failure: aseptic implant loosening--the contribution and future challenges of mouse models in translational research.The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: Analysis of 185 revisions from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.Osteocyte physiology and response to fluid shear stress are impaired following exposure to cobalt and chromium: Implications for bone health following joint replacement.Cobalt and chromium exposure affects osteoblast function and impairs the mineralization of prosthesis surfaces in vitro.Increased risk for extended acetabular reconstruction in failed hip resurfacing as compared to failed total hip arthroplasty.Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on FollowupA unified multi-level model approach to assessing patient responsiveness including; return to normal, minimally important differences and minimal clinically important improvement for patient reported outcome measures.CORR Insights(®): Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
P2860
Q24202249-79CFBEA5-F43D-4930-8951-CE8E060FFE47Q26738842-501D848D-E987-4522-9546-8C6EC8D9E317Q26830723-35BF4FBC-808A-4C91-95F6-F79056C9343BQ28071476-56E0B3EE-85F6-44BC-8065-27E1274B4AD0Q30387926-70BD0960-0EAB-4AD5-ACC0-CC4867BAB2D3Q30883277-1595287B-5BEA-4850-AC8C-01177946A6FDQ33756075-66E1FA79-E364-4769-B77E-A00455BB8DC4Q34157467-55B221FC-F62F-4FD3-9ECE-283010571C1DQ34457882-24BEBF1A-8A0D-416E-A25D-4BFFDFB5C8DCQ34556947-3452ABAE-2979-4856-A198-F5353E430839Q35197615-475928FD-18A6-4DF9-AAD5-BC5100B981C0Q35632023-4CF74EDD-3882-4614-8D12-9E5AB38F354AQ35724304-573BFED1-5CAD-40ED-9C63-95924A0B49D7Q36042352-52E4C842-3F27-4BF9-8743-912A29D691A4Q36100921-ED60E629-6BE2-4FCB-A3AB-CE7F3734BB45Q36101102-2A71E724-BAC4-4A17-80EC-DD5EAFBB0976Q36179277-55985A63-F8BE-415A-8C9C-F22C41336C61Q36303937-C998951E-8CE5-465F-BE93-52ECB773BFCCQ36465776-86BBA459-357C-431C-88C7-D08288DB08E4Q36600710-14CDE663-70E6-4B87-B732-0FD1F139B926Q36740822-1E73F953-1130-4880-A698-5EDCFC985981Q36857051-C23B01DA-29E3-4BBE-BC96-15302F65ED98Q37072363-B6AE735E-1D08-4D09-A2ED-AE7A93A79AB4Q37094968-AC5705BF-18F4-4A96-80BF-70B84698100BQ37191083-D98975FD-D597-45EE-93AE-499D84D15D05Q37503439-966AE37D-D288-4358-B5F1-719E0F1F52E3Q37503908-58D76549-7BA2-48DE-85FD-B4C89C38A922Q37556594-80165DB9-7403-4F99-9F9D-DA935FCB1CADQ37557972-67AF3A57-7A62-4D2B-9B81-3B62180C4990Q37672643-CF224798-9040-48E1-B09D-416E4F0091F9Q37720148-92A3BB5C-A4B6-45EA-9BAE-136EC841ABAFQ38211743-D221270E-5420-4550-9A6B-ABBCD6A49667Q38364554-985080C5-7230-48F1-9130-87A766F56893Q38657344-BDBC2EF1-83CF-4FC2-BAAB-E96D5D88A0EDQ38743516-CC25163E-F9FC-4268-A303-3928B1D9FA88Q38880461-4511B87D-7F16-4D40-9FFA-C92EED0E0B87Q40179982-FC3097D1-205D-44AA-83FD-5D13DBA66059Q41113036-49398985-92EE-4E99-9AB1-920A1BE85B64Q41572161-96B9F7DA-F176-49A8-984D-9934B1E783FDQ41637926-6DA46408-1D57-4FF8-99F2-47331321E9D7
P2860
Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@ast
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@en
type
label
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@ast
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@en
prefLabel
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@ast
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Failure rates of metal-on-meta ...... egistry for England and Wales.
@en
P2093
Alison J Smith
Ashley W Blom
National Joint Registry for England and Wales
Paul Dieppe
Peter W Howard
P304
P356
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60989-1
P407
P577
2012-10-02T00:00:00Z