An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
about
A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveysEfficacy and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in a 21/7 regimen.Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.A systematic review of methods to measure menstrual blood loss
P2860
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@ast
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@en
type
label
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@ast
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@en
prefLabel
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@ast
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
An electronic menstrual cycle calendar: comparison of data quality with a paper version
@en
P2093
C B Johannes
K B Johnson
R B Goldstein
S L Crawford
S Mehrotra
P304
P356
10.1097/00042192-200007030-00011
P407
P577
2000-05-01T00:00:00Z