A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.
about
Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventionsIs personality a key predictor of missing study data? An analysis from a randomized controlled trialHow to assess the external validity and model validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach to systematic review methodologyUsing evidence from different sources: an example using paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mgSystematic review of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancerComparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: methodological overviewAdding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy.Mistletoe Preparation Iscador: Are there Methodological Concerns with Respect to Controlled Clinical Trials?Prevalence and risk of mental disorders in the perinatal period among migrant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurofeedback as a form of cognitive rehabilitation therapy following stroke: A systematic reviewBody characteristics, [corrected] dietary protein and body weight regulation. Reconciling conflicting results from intervention and observational studies?Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview.Cytoreductive surgery in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases compared with systemic chemotherapy aloneShort- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysisObservational and clinical trial findings on the comparative effectiveness of diabetes drugs showed agreement.Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include.Evaluating medical effectiveness for the california health benefits review programMeta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer.An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance status and access, care delivery, and outcomes for patients who are critically ill.Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.Safety and Efficacy of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for High Grade Glioma in Usual Clinical Practice: A Prospective Cohort Study.Meta-analytic comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies of breast cancer surgeryDo observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.Enhancing Participation in Depression Care in Outpatient Perinatal Care Settings: A Systematic ReviewThe use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.Systemic Immunomodulating Therapies for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Combining Non-randomized and Randomized Data in Clinical Trials Using Commensurate PriorsCase-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy.Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings.Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review.The impact of funding through the RF President's grants for young scientists (the field--medicine) on research productivity: a quasi-experimental study and a brief systematic review.Treatments for compulsive buying: A systematic review of the quality, effectiveness and progression of the outcome evidence.Addressing multimorbidity in evidence integration and synthesis.Invasive ventilation modes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysisReporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis.Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.Comment on "Limitations of observational evidence: implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations".
P2860
Q21261929-0BC42976-C474-4EAA-8744-D6080A8EC667Q24288800-24DE721A-A06C-4EFD-B849-9691EDC5D320Q24289013-2F5E549E-1653-4F84-83C4-4A18124761A0Q24799128-8932274A-D635-49F6-B685-D9DC7527F844Q27693303-DDBD723C-B3B3-46E8-B867-FFA78C986D6AQ28535464-F328570F-CC39-4995-B26C-468ED006F110Q30825274-950A92F1-E0B0-49DA-86D7-30E88877310FQ33346969-081AD8AC-F6D3-4305-B145-E85F69778A05Q33379756-294FDA79-DB99-4A00-BEF9-A3F94E6FCBCFQ33654011-6237FB9D-AB16-442D-A30F-9E95310AA00CQ33693666-825C182E-0740-4F9F-900D-025EBD64AC30Q33843231-74B10D1E-DBF8-4928-8E78-E28E33211D8AQ33894784-19C5A343-EFF4-464C-9E92-0C995DBE1A56Q34354500-0AF3FEEE-E093-4622-B790-5B08AC6CEF33Q34978315-53B5CA30-3A33-42F9-AFC5-CFDD56512DBBQ35146648-9ADA9D20-81B4-4BB7-A56E-8233EC819E82Q35225188-A0A4DA92-F105-4E9B-ADFC-803D6587E553Q35241172-FAFFD5FE-2446-447B-A49A-75FFDA84DA29Q35627290-EF5C9A03-4C75-4D50-AE12-CEC9EC1B01F6Q35716160-767F0401-3506-40EB-8496-862AAA187F99Q35734332-28F7ED95-D7E0-4673-A5B9-DF65E2392CADQ35925839-0233C16E-F18E-4864-A9BF-76482033D921Q35998809-5E9D09ED-40E1-4F24-801E-D6F73FA28F5BQ36131480-89E2EB72-6AFD-43A0-AEA7-FD1EC328CDBFQ36201816-3ADD2B3B-882F-4BDB-A2DD-EA41399ED8C6Q36284808-2005028D-5285-4115-8BFC-34D0E87C3247Q36318645-7C0C1494-56EC-4956-B6D5-C1D917EE1D87Q36359341-3277DCF6-4DB7-41B3-B954-56D79F81E889Q36969788-8379248F-1BB3-4A08-B0B0-86EFF0B3A53AQ37402842-2E7150F2-D1A7-44DF-9DF2-64681216F56DQ37459030-C957C644-717D-4313-8EF5-392BCC079804Q37521060-2BCF48C4-D5AE-489E-A363-6B6B700B83CFQ37604876-EEE708A7-64E8-4739-89D5-6EA391FA567FQ37663054-886D61A4-788B-40B9-AC42-BB3A1F4E933BQ37829479-E6F5A178-B186-440B-9ACC-2AB32EA12EA8Q38223891-5D8CEAFE-227F-4283-B397-F6E4746B6646Q38693046-4B6427C2-9CFA-4815-A6B8-1F70269F60CCQ41578931-E9C515C3-BC50-4BA7-94F1-C01D73ED4C17Q42115023-D4F0AF79-7EA5-43A6-9C36-5AA1305D0D7DQ42559085-05FC2A6C-A9A0-4593-84C3-23503555E391
P2860
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@ast
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@en
type
label
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@ast
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@en
prefLabel
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@ast
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@en
P2093
P1476
A systematic review of compari ...... ed and non-randomised studies.
@en
P2093
P577
2000-01-01T00:00:00Z