Magnetic resonance evaluation of multiple myeloma at 3.0 Tesla: how do bone marrow plasma cell percentage and selection of protocols affect lesion conspicuity? - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Magnetic resonance evaluation of multiple myeloma at 3.0 Tesla: how do bone marrow plasma cell percentage and selection of protocols affect lesion conspicuity?

Magnetic resonance evaluation of multiple myeloma at 3.0 Tesla: how do bone marrow plasma cell percentage and selection of protocols affect lesion conspicuity?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30747155

about

Diagnostic utility of whole body Dixon MRI in multiple myeloma: A multi-reader study.

P2860

Q40973660-167291F4-C4A2-4EA4-A47F-6B0AA9EF859C

P2860

Magnetic resonance evaluation of multiple myeloma at 3.0 Tesla: how do bone marrow plasma cell percentage and selection of protocols affect lesion conspicuity?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q30747155

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2014 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年論文

@yue

2014年論文

@zh-hant

2014年論文

@zh-hk

2014年論文

@zh-mo

2014年論文

@zh-tw

2014年论文

@wuu

name

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@ast

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@en

type

label

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@ast

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@en

prefLabel

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@ast

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@en

P1433

Q30747155-25298302-59FA-4218-94F8-3DC66004ADD1

P1476

Q30747155-C8980BB5-10DD-476B-9399-C61923E7AD7A

P2093

Q30747155-1104D3E7-BFE4-423E-97D4-60CF91F0DB08

Q30747155-19634786-86F6-4F69-B7C6-2D6352CCF031

Q30747155-1A34834E-C6EF-43A0-BFBC-4D823D1645D6

Q30747155-3B73818C-CD25-46F5-B83C-F8457A42C2D3

Q30747155-52142FE6-772B-44CA-9ED5-45B8CDE8872C

Q30747155-67C3C4D8-CE53-4700-82CF-E6F7465E8C34

Q30747155-6A004520-25A2-4F69-98D7-79DC4971F282

Q30747155-A47877B8-9EDD-4239-8996-CED751AD5793

Q30747155-A632ED13-0992-40ED-9EFF-64C75436B8D6

P2860

Q30747155-0265F8BF-CD89-4D1F-88B1-408B322C66BC

Q30747155-1728ECB9-A918-4F97-AF84-87B3F8396A5C

Q30747155-1B1F4BB2-264C-489B-B560-CF0A4103AF89

Q30747155-2607469B-954C-49EA-9284-00D5EE77E369

Q30747155-31B995A6-8C7B-4699-B6CF-FA1FF82E6613

Q30747155-35369A37-FB43-44DA-84BB-8E1233D013AA

Q30747155-3A6958C9-34AD-4D5A-BAAC-D10218D48D6D

Q30747155-4AB08198-4B27-4BD6-82BF-3743D330DB42

Q30747155-4D56917C-7D8F-4169-8042-4F926BB8D9B7

Q30747155-592515B4-8470-46B7-80FC-87EA065F1B76

P304

Q30747155-CD754118-168F-4107-B250-CF427025EA12

P31

Q30747155-3C446A16-AC00-47DC-8FF7-356DAF1F1711

P356

Q30747155-A8E1EE3A-341A-4C01-B420-2CBC18FB6B71

P407

Q30747155-D39F1C6A-F087-4190-BD91-4FF9618A34F7

P433

Q30747155-9E3E966F-6681-4491-877B-887AED2EF6BB

P478

Q30747155-2B29FEFB-7161-44E9-87B3-99F1E7E83092

P577

Q30747155-2EE9677D-5F76-47A6-9CD7-6F5195037EAF

P5875

Q30747155-9AFA4BCE-0071-458C-BEF9-C6DE5AFA6779

P698

Q30747155-D98FD5B3-C36B-47D5-A56D-89FCEE4DB8CB

P932

Q30747155-B469938F-77DE-4B64-BF9F-92CC05A2ADBD

P356

JOURNAL.PONE.0085931

P1433

P1476

Magnetic resonance evaluation ...... ols affect lesion conspicuity?

@en

P2093

Akira Sakai

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kazuo Awai

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Keizo Tanitame

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Miyuki Takasu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Shuji Date

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Takayuki Tamura

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yoko Kaichi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yoshiaki Kuroda

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yuji Akiyama

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group

International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma

Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging.

Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method.

T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression.

Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging.

Field map estimation with a region growing scheme for iterative 3-point water-fat decomposition.

Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging.

IDEAL imaging of the musculoskeletal system: robust water fat separation for uniform fat suppression, marrow evaluation, and cartilage imaging.

Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction.

P304

e85931

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0085931

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2014-01-28T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

260063144

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24489680

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3904853

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string