The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians.
about
Do cardiology quality measures actually improve patient outcomes?Bundled Payments for Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Medicare Administrative Data.Administrative data fail to accurately identify cases of healthcare-associated infection.Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years.General practitioners' perceptions of public reporting of institution and individual medicine prescribing data.Motivating public use of physician-level performance data: an experiment on the effects of message and mode.Is there evidence of cream skimming among nursing homes following the publication of the Nursing Home Compare report card?Has pay-for-performance decreased access for minority patients?Improvement in mortality risk prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention through the addition of a "compassionate use" variable to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI dataset: a study from the Massachusetts Angioplasty RegistrA severity scoring system for risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial and Registry.What has to happen before we report radical prostatectomy outcomes of individual surgeons to the public?Access to coronary artery bypass graft surgery under pay for performance: evidence from the premier hospital quality incentive demonstrationAssociation between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarctionMultivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England.How do you know if you are any good? A surgeon performance feedback system for the outcomes of radical prostatectomy.The year of transparency: measuring quality of cardiac care.Underreporting high-risk prescribing among Medicare Advantage plans: a cross-sectional analysisDo cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence.Are high-quality cardiac surgeons less likely to operate on high-risk patients compared to low-quality surgeons? Evidence from New York State.Cumulative funnel plots for the early detection of interoperator variation: retrospective database analysis of observed versus predicted results of percutaneous coronary intervention.Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.Thinking About Clinical Outcomes in Medicaid.Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.Getting (Along) With the Guidelines: Reconciling Patient Autonomy and Quality Improvement Through Shared Decision Making.The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary interventionDoes risk adjustment of the CMS quality measures for nursing homes matter?Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.The impact of extreme-risk cases on hospitals' risk-adjusted percutaneous coronary intervention mortality ratings.Dissemination of performance information and continuous improvement: A narrative systematic review.Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse.The evolution of weak standards: the case of the Swedish rheumatology quality registry.Risk scores do not adjust for aggressive, evidence-based changes in percutaneous coronary intervention practice patterns.Inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery.Significant regional variation exists in morbidity and mortality after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Is mortality a useful parameter for public reporting in pacemaker implantation? Results of an obligatory external quality control programme.One-year mortality after a first visit to a cardiology outpatient clinic: a useful performance indicator?Effect of cost efficiency reporting on utilization by physician specialists: a difference-in-difference study.Quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology: a Position Statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Part II: public reporting and risk adjustment.Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting.
P2860
Q27024825-2450C834-2C81-490B-887B-A4CDCAE42A18Q30985475-D1A913CD-D5B0-4D6C-A50C-84B5F659AC88Q31037012-605ACBF2-FEAC-4710-B37F-7589608A7B4EQ31094489-1B0F9D4B-60DF-49F4-93BC-FDA7C4F25857Q31141672-5C34528E-B921-4C7A-9E67-31ADBF037274Q33376959-CF63C260-15E9-46C4-BC92-7C66E00F0E79Q33567464-2579B2F8-038F-4183-9560-81C1598F5208Q33618712-8263B67F-6F12-4A75-8108-25664A32E13FQ33823322-3C2B394A-82C6-4453-A630-B9C5B853DB36Q34497058-B5D5DCBF-E125-48B3-A41A-CAC32EBF6B84Q34561141-26415724-B609-4D85-8575-00E337FAD9D7Q34787656-4FD055B3-021E-4930-B80B-FCF6484D6A58Q35203574-609FDD86-3D8D-4237-B3EE-B58AECA2575FQ35771641-4AF5C277-370D-4D48-B542-A1C31319653DQ36052922-24EE8A6F-43ED-40E9-B20C-0D61880E367BQ36087384-BD7B559A-5AD1-41AB-89D7-84D439F16C0DQ36484625-1B12A55D-E059-44E4-80AD-1CB13F0933A0Q36538856-4CB468EA-F32B-45D3-BB98-545F92909A36Q36570343-DEBEEDFC-1256-4DD8-843D-936806A03C78Q36585343-BC3EF855-D4B6-47B8-AB92-4AF9EFEE0929Q36839686-F60EBC22-56A5-45C4-9FE1-F1F40A616D4AQ36852288-E216829C-5991-4B08-8D7E-CD2A5615DB28Q36974708-B96B0291-F0B9-414A-857F-73AB9116F126Q37036719-B96E5276-93D0-483A-B0FA-8B01BC985660Q37171148-79C1520D-22FD-4C50-88DB-0899B695F5E8Q37340945-53C5C81A-A721-4977-84BD-BC068BBB584AQ37422043-873EE0B0-6026-4598-9988-EE7ED9C6E39AQ37712290-354D9887-2515-4CDF-8879-88E570539677Q38134082-AC0FA166-3AE6-414B-AA33-83AFF187188BQ38217343-2C58B92D-0644-4C05-A403-FC15691A7F67Q38791321-4977A61F-AC1F-49C8-AC81-3055F5D82729Q39030440-F76433F1-8C60-4AFC-9D6A-2E72B8656319Q39035814-DEA59B9B-4F23-4692-A9AC-8B6976C93750Q39153444-82F8A1C4-DC12-4EC0-8542-AD880DD84194Q40242313-89BA2C7A-2A37-4A09-847E-ABF41D2638EEQ41816759-A8A2FBD4-78A9-4792-AC9C-D215FC52F57FQ42694914-B91007E8-038F-4374-91BB-8E14D5002BCCQ43589876-E1F0942E-9B97-4F82-9791-7E298B31C74AQ47652767-52F03D3B-96D2-47F8-895D-65B49101BC87Q49474558-4B0207AA-9AA9-425A-8D6E-92E6A53B6AA6
P2860
The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2005 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
name
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@ast
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@en
type
label
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@ast
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@en
prefLabel
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@ast
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@en
P2093
P1476
The influence of public report ...... decision making by physicians.
@en
P2093
Ann M Dozier
Craig R Narins
Frederick S Ling
P356
10.1001/ARCHINTE.165.1.83
P407
P577
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z