Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
about
The persistent sodium current blocker riluzole is antiarrhythmic and anti-ischaemic in a pig model of acute myocardial infarctionSpatial distribution and extent of electroporation by strong internal shock in intact structurally normal and chronically infarcted rabbit hearts.Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression.Defibrillation threshold testing fails to show clinical benefit during long-term follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation.Cardiac pacing and defibrillation in children and young adults.How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?Ventricular fibrillation: are swine a sensitive species?Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing and postoperative long-term efficacy of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.Low-energy cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: When less is more.Automatic determination of timing intervals for upper limit of vulnerability using ICD electrograms.Baseball, crackers, green dust, nose candy, and snow cones: cocaine, defibrillation, and ICDs.Defibrillator Threshold Testing at Generator Replacement: Is it Time to Abandon the Practice?A comparison of chronaxies for ventricular fibrillation induction, defibrillation, and cardiac stimulation: unexpected findings and their implications
P2860
Q28748172-83B9427F-395B-4D91-960D-A48302CBAA92Q30491458-A0F6F0DA-064E-4FE8-9AF7-322913E77933Q33577173-55CC7BF5-1BF6-4BFC-868F-1B9CDB378250Q34840455-143820DC-EF8D-4B5C-988B-58C03436BFCCQ36515909-75690A37-D74A-4743-81D1-7DDA530F88EEQ38099563-5E94C789-D36F-4D6E-BA4B-71779C26D82BQ41578670-2665E5C7-132C-42CD-81CC-EC035C71A8C1Q42050692-118044BD-4566-4E1A-A8D7-67E87DBE25E0Q43106987-45D4BAB7-2DE7-4AC8-A8EA-9DA2D2313DC0Q43750407-23692E40-56BD-4488-9236-8B9A8A148424Q48594378-998EA547-F175-408D-A30D-78BFC882BCDDQ53572389-B44A1DEA-62A2-4D2E-9914-296625FAB57FQ57646369-46418142-79DA-404F-A865-6965D2CEF5B1
P2860
Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@ast
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@en
type
label
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@ast
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@en
prefLabel
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@ast
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Using the upper limit of vulne ...... icacy at implantation of ICDs.
@en
P2093
Charles D Swerdlow
Michael Shehata
Peng-Sheng Chen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1540-8159.2007.00659.X
P577
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z