Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33256738

about

The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies Providing foraging resources for solitary bees on farmland: current schemes for pollinators benefit a limited suite of species The response of farmland bird communities to agricultural intensity as influenced by its spatial aggregation.Food sovereignty: an alternative paradigm for poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation in Latin America Action versus result-oriented schemes in a grassland agroecosystem: a dynamic modelling approach.Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system Quantifying the impact and relevance of scientific research.Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.Wildlife-friendly farming benefits rare birds, bees and plants.Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence-based approach.A novel and cost-effective monitoring approach for outcomes in an Australian biodiversity conservation incentive program Prediction uncertainty of environmental change effects on temperate European biodiversity.Ecological restoration of farmland: progress and prospects.The payoff of conservation investments in tropical countryside.Field-level bird abundances are enhanced by landscape-scale agri-environment scheme uptake.Traditional cattle grazing in a mosaic alkali landscape: effects on grassland biodiversity along a moisture gradient.Patches of bare ground as a staple commodity for declining ground-foraging insectivorous farmland birds.The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates.Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.Grazed wet meadows are sink habitats for the southern dunlin (Calidris alpina schinzii) due to nest trampling by cattle.Decreased functional diversity and biological pest control in conventional compared to organic crop fields.Effects of agri-environmental schemes on farmland birds: do food availability measurements improve patterns obtained from simple habitat models?Promoting pollinating insects in intensive agricultural matrices: field-scale experimental manipulation of hay-meadow mowing regimes and its effects on bees Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation.A macro-scale perspective on within-farm management: how climate and topography alter the effect of farming practices.Effects of organic farming on biodiversity and ecosystem services: taking landscape complexity into account.The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks.Plant diversity partitioning in Mediterranean croplands: effects of farming intensity, field edge, and landscape context.Effects of traditional flood irrigation on invertebrates in lowland meadows.Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared.How does economic risk aversion affect biodiversity?Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss--a meta-analysis.The Conservation Value of Traditional Rural Landscapes: The Case of Woodpeckers in Transylvania, Romania.Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields.Agri-environmental policy measures in Israel: the potential of using market-oriented instruments.How to maximally support local and regional biodiversity in applied conservation? Insights from pond management.Adaptation of bird communities to farmland abandonment in a mountain landscape.Ecosystem-service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in riparian zones of the US Midwest.

P2860

Q27005582-7660F52B-576B-497F-8443-BB85039B1B7A Q28749429-7AEE0983-D27D-4A30-BBD8-FF219D4BFB08 Q29399508-FC60E056-C7EB-4F75-A9B5-B57647E73079 Q30389153-584E23F1-8AEC-490B-B7DA-11ADD98E0EC7 Q30392607-54F2129D-0F27-43EF-8E12-32F8D88B5AB1 Q30395403-6E441F2B-5E38-4E46-B6A2-50D18FCAA5EC Q30395661-D9FBD7C6-C0E0-4643-94A2-4F6641208A29 Q30395767-BD16C4CD-B82F-47E9-9B5C-BF5E387F65E7 Q30397783-4CCFF44E-AF9B-43BC-A403-CA8ED7497418 Q30524888-8E06038B-0583-465C-899A-1A8ED79CDD66 Q30792929-FDEDA652-D98C-4468-92D5-A5990F7971C3 Q31108653-3E1D7596-22EF-4D0C-A6FB-61C9A403C7AD Q31139487-BA324E9B-8ABF-4298-A73A-9599BDF96D73 Q33296130-D000B440-09B0-47E4-8042-D534E7DA0426 Q33387536-73958ED4-072C-46F8-9886-4A016797FFC1 Q33561490-36878824-C9FD-415F-B151-C3EA2AFAA70B Q33584242-B65FE044-CD03-46ED-8981-FCEC602380D8 Q33719437-A2DA9DB7-3854-4F6D-81F9-54821E1C950C Q33729331-572250F1-ACAB-4EFD-B718-1468C8F15681 Q33750670-DC490488-574D-42E6-ADE0-61F37148BC54 Q33910248-1B082F96-7259-4576-9EC6-E1B94F3BD8BD Q33911241-384FA475-0CEC-4935-A9F8-D7685C67A0FD Q34034688-3F462D3C-5C11-47F6-A962-EC1525AADF88 Q34039554-F292DD0F-67D4-4558-BA97-A8914531D177 Q34044269-FD37833C-D786-467B-BC03-E84940F16251 Q34045334-B1893119-3286-45F4-9257-AB417B09ECC8 Q34159313-C732D2B3-F217-4918-87AD-B45E5F3B97B9 Q34169629-A1FF422B-146B-4135-9275-81FD7BD112D4 Q34285861-8493BBB1-07D0-47A1-919B-69D7C53E1DF6 Q34395724-06680A56-D951-45B0-B0CA-694071768085 Q34579937-AEB1729D-D722-46BE-8DD6-130F58C09C26 Q34621194-D8017BD0-64D9-4C32-8F67-93CDF9759CF4 Q34699806-0EF55C93-AE5F-4C62-85E2-B384C5505430 Q34743234-BBCE4215-E9D5-4B53-A138-C4DB0F5613DB Q34804414-643C7E7B-37DE-4263-87B9-65BFE14DD7EC Q34831059-0507480E-7CDF-42DC-AE5F-6E91B5F033FE Q34928450-14B1D40D-BFFA-4A48-8E96-C92E0CA6A3FA Q34951732-EEB2AB12-C3A6-471F-A257-D3DCF760CF56 Q34984499-7E3D6DC5-5128-4744-9FE4-37336815EFA4 Q35040391-CD92FE00-FB45-47A8-A9F0-07E72C837D6D

P2860

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33256738

description

2006 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2006 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2006 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2006年の論文

@ja

2006年論文

@yue

2006年論文

@zh-hant

2006年論文

@zh-hk

2006年論文

@zh-mo

2006年論文

@zh-tw

2006年论文

@wuu

name

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@ast

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@en

type

label

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@ast

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@en

prefLabel

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@ast

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

@en

P1433

Q33256738-EAC6CEA3-C2DE-4991-9E05-FD766EEA7758

P1476

Q33256738-18CEE1C2-2386-495D-8C84-1EFE9627916A

P2093

Q33256738-204BE9A9-E414-457B-8FF3-FB94DEE037F3

Q33256738-321A8658-F09D-4121-9F6E-982E36BED3DB

Q33256738-4F5C1710-0B98-4EAE-A8CA-4A0F1B446FAE

Q33256738-525620A0-4B68-4E57-811F-5139499C3A1B

Q33256738-741C6DFC-D51A-4589-9E58-42600DC2A4EC

Q33256738-99C59C80-C0A9-4455-BBCF-C9E0BD941C1F

Q33256738-B1063E58-E871-4BDC-B8F4-C37BB4F0809E

Q33256738-BD43C4E4-F8E4-4791-A16E-0BA974C9E51C

Q33256738-C5A3A871-EC7D-4E77-8024-1FF226EAF650

Q33256738-C8EBB6C0-33E2-4124-8F32-166924DEC3E6

P2860

Q33256738-05207E93-A1D2-4646-A37F-B3079DAABB65

Q33256738-1A6AFCC8-2294-43ED-A42D-14987527909C

Q33256738-2294848B-43E3-4849-83EC-9067692CCCDB

Q33256738-2BF3CC49-D8A5-49DB-B382-DFD303164AC8

Q33256738-3E365B63-4A60-4A9A-AA62-E5EBB1380780

Q33256738-43301A4D-B845-47EE-A893-2FFA76632945

Q33256738-4F2381D6-628A-45E4-921A-FDCF96D95F15

Q33256738-65952C4D-9F91-41E5-A93D-D178CF6C04EC

Q33256738-6CE95193-EF28-4B6F-8A6A-B2BD6860D535

Q33256738-84E3988F-38BD-43B1-A52D-794CA1B9B265

P304

Q33256738-BA0E66D4-1161-4C3C-A781-698FABF41E56

P31

Q33256738-7AEF71B7-35C5-4FC8-99BF-F895A84BB851

P356

Q33256738-0176E699-1812-4B28-AAB6-2825A11C29C6

P407

Q33256738-C97AAE03-4A48-4922-B12E-F393F6885E0D

P433

Q33256738-0B5418E5-6E9A-4E98-BF0A-EE4A0A03F59F

P478

Q33256738-A0453453-EF2C-4CD4-BC04-9ADE88B864A4

P50

Q33256738-62374DE1-59EE-455D-BC3E-4D2BA760C321

Q33256738-6B20FBB5-1C33-4F31-A38B-65B820521087

Q33256738-99F101D6-8F40-462F-9AA7-F9359638D0DE

Q33256738-AB50BC5C-3352-4352-A706-2DFE38BCECB3

Q33256738-B9A71D70-4988-48D4-909B-8067525CC8C2

Q33256738-D3464A61-1B7A-4FEF-9964-84E55DECCEE3

Q33256738-FB58EE00-0C4E-4917-A2C8-22B1EDCBDD72

P577

Q33256738-86259CA9-567A-4A78-91CC-CD2DC9C23FA5

P5875

Q33256738-3A45068C-7570-4EB7-9F46-111D16EBD759

P698

Q33256738-112C9531-FABC-4D88-AE44-F9A5D79ECC61

P921

Q33256738-C185C462-E19C-459B-858A-E6DA73B64E29

P356

J.1461-0248.2005.00869.X

P1433

Ecology Letters

P1476

Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries

@en

P2093

Baquero RA

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

De Esteban J

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Díaz M

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gabriel D

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Herzog F

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jöhl R

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kruess A

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tscharntke T

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Verhulst J

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

West TM

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes.

Declining biodiversity in agricultural landscapes and the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes.

Parental investment, reproductive success and polygyny in the lapwing, Vanellus vanellus.

Parish boundaries and early fields: continuity and discontinuity

Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations.

Conservation of the Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus) in agricultural areas

Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades

How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?

Predicting the response of farmland bird populations to changing food supplies

Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity â ecosystem service management

P304

243-54; discussion 254-7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1461-0248.2005.00869.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Federico Fernández González

Andrea Holzschuh

E.J.P. Marshall

P577

2006-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

6831259

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

16958888

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921