Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
about
Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSETwo-stage cementless revision of infected hip endoprostheses.The use of high-dose dual-impregnated antibiotic-laden cement with hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a fracture of the hip: The Fractured Hip Infection trial.The effect of high dose antibiotic impregnated cement on rate of surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur: a protocol for a double-blind quasi randomised controlled trialTwo-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility tests on polystyrene and metal surfaces.Septic Arthritis of the Hip Complicated by Secondary Fungal Superinfection.[The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].Loading with vancomycin does not decrease gentamicin elution in gentamicin premixed bone cement.Increased antibiotic release from a bone cement containing bacterial cellulose.Does dithiothreitol improve bacterial detection from infected prostheses? A pilot study.Liquid dextran does not increase the elution rate of different antibiotics from bone cement.Not all approved antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement brands are the same: ranking using the utility materials selection concept.
P2860
Q35242699-C1327CE7-4F5B-466D-B896-8B3A15F36D86Q35858822-67602BF5-E749-4F23-9082-C60A80B2A2A6Q37213152-FA8D9E87-BE05-4AA0-AC21-C6AF75DB9BC8Q37403589-A7A22736-8223-4DF2-85DC-489017384723Q37426366-84517EB9-99F5-4AC5-8631-7A5F48D08C87Q37615928-4CBD6CC6-977D-44BB-80AA-398A7D79779DQ37615934-4C9F8FC1-6918-4FE5-81DC-40AD40687668Q39638327-546DBC06-2BE1-4357-A5B6-27B9E8B66089Q40165880-62A0CB1E-7D82-45C9-90AC-A2DD9056C31EQ40200018-0452113F-CFE5-4C83-8885-CF7104B5E429Q40202417-D322A5B0-0F03-4F8F-B90E-D3C9C403987BQ42109909-E201B378-CFE2-4553-965C-7B33CC2CAEB0Q42325197-F66446B0-9B8C-47E9-802A-87C7788B396FQ47610545-B0EDA194-1682-488A-9B64-261925911168Q53336909-D78E76DA-A6BE-4DA8-A678-147528F80FEA
P2860
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@ast
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@en
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.
@nl
type
label
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@ast
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@en
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.
@nl
altLabel
Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
@en
prefLabel
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@ast
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@en
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G
@en
P2093
Daniëlle Neut
Geert T Ensing
Henk J Busscher
Henny C van der Mei
Jim R van Horn
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11999-008-0203-X
P407
P577
2008-03-13T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1036665335