Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
about
Industry sponsorship and research outcomeCognitive rehabilitation for occupational outcomes after traumatic brain injuryAssociation of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritisSelf-medication of migraine and tension-type headache: summary of the evidence-based recommendations of the Deutsche Migräne und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN), the Österreichische KopfschmerzgesellschEffectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literatureThe effect of tailored Web-based interventions on pain in adults: a systematic review protocolThe Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsA systematic review of cognitive rehabilitation for bipolar disorderMilrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysisThe influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review.The effect of work-based mentoring on patient outcome in musculoskeletal physiotherapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.Associations between statins and COPD: a systematic review.Systematic review and meta-analysis on the adverse events of rimonabant treatment: considerations for its potential use in hepatology.Efficacy and safety of desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review.Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical efficacyAssessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological studyYoga for breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies.Systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture to reduce cancer-related pain.Aerobic exercise effect on prognostic markers for systolic heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lack of evidence for intravenous vasodilators in ED patients with acute heart failure: a systematic reviewA proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies.Meta-analysis: the effects of placebo treatment on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.Meta-analysis for dorsally displaced distal radius fracture fixation: volar locking plate versus percutaneous Kirschner wiresNo clear benefit or drawback to the use of closed drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Identifying Important Gaps in Randomized Controlled Trials of Adult Cardiac Arrest Treatments: A Systematic Review of the Published Literature.Improving management of type 2 diabetes in South Asian patients: a systematic review of intervention studiesSearching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: critical reflections on three case studies.The methodological quality of three foundational law enforcement Drug Influence Evaluation validation studies.The Effectiveness of Aromatherapy for Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic ReviewMethodology used in comparative studies assessing programmes of transition from paediatrics to adult care programmes: a systematic review.Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.Weak evidence to support benefit of periodontal maintenance therapy in prevention of tooth loss.A practical educational tool for teaching child-care hospital professionals attending evidence-based practice courses for continuing medical education to appraise internal validity in systematic reviews.Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge.Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010.Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study.
P2860
Q24202591-ADF796BD-3A4A-4893-9FA5-4725916FFC32Q24240774-8E157C5E-5ADA-4DDB-AE2B-1EF7EF6E71FBQ24289540-4E2BABC6-017A-4E58-AB26-ED28C29E4D85Q24619383-004087CC-72B6-44B4-868A-1D733F57E51BQ27006759-EADEBFBD-39F8-458D-8E3B-43280676B4FDQ27320188-F750A1AA-22E7-42A6-B9EC-B4B71076278CQ27860509-8A36EDF2-1ED0-405D-958E-86B757920136Q28081394-89E695DA-9F17-4B5A-8D39-8C6528821BBCQ28277307-7C8DDB02-BD35-40DD-8948-6607C93575B6Q30417885-A8B71B3D-5F89-44F9-90C8-8D884F40602AQ30597113-FF4A8031-96C6-4118-AE5D-4B327AD4E100Q31161134-5D0ECFF7-BFFD-4EE8-BBCD-FEBE6CE5F028Q33481269-C1C119A1-42F7-445A-A637-D8861839CE6DQ33509626-F8BF386C-B63B-479F-882B-CD2FA9AD2951Q33644102-1A98E37F-BC3D-4571-BCB4-97E0BA39764FQ33728984-FF8C8C75-C58D-4319-8C04-3CBC784E376AQ33776837-097A3AA0-D8E1-4788-B2A0-0246B7171ABFQ34265852-7C76B1EA-4BE4-4B85-8206-1D7E55A734CFQ34299192-8D8B257C-FB53-40F0-B56F-9CA1606CCE53Q34300441-BB95F456-70A5-4D15-B8CD-C856D69C7653Q34371293-2E402EEF-BE35-4B13-AD11-911FDEE25202Q34512755-2F1103B0-A565-4513-8147-51B9AF9992B2Q35017888-82CD4057-5148-4321-9CDA-5E62EF948B26Q35132420-AFBD2BBC-CACB-4605-A259-1F76CEB55248Q35137942-95722D07-FEC9-46BE-9073-B1829508BE2DQ35147233-ACC45F93-FE82-48EE-A37A-42BB4AB6E40CQ35690003-39CF701F-2AF1-4B26-94B2-0B4F6F443C48Q36000287-7B28779F-9A8F-444A-9830-981B9DAD62E0Q36167123-F09BA5E1-DBFD-4800-BAC4-91CAF286EE13Q36819046-297965A1-DC23-4480-A6B0-12A79A698AB9Q37294489-C8EC0169-050C-4310-B6DF-ED48269717E0Q37309982-A6CBBE37-4DCE-4708-A53F-1BED002B8B1AQ37590880-2CFB5377-9F6B-4022-9336-32AF3E017B43Q37612116-D0571AC2-F6F6-49CC-8361-0A42DA2722D1Q37779121-C7152488-C9EA-48A9-9645-25D8E0D69A88Q37799535-4E186909-98F9-441C-A14E-44BCE13BC74AQ38030575-F54D4418-361C-4A7A-8169-6B3DCA09E50DQ38111237-63F13F59-2B91-4241-9C2D-138EB2231439Q38112559-3C80DE0C-B65D-4B8E-B235-3D0CFCF97719Q38131408-B0C9D256-2081-42F7-B014-71B5001AA6E4
P2860
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@ast
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@en
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@nl
type
label
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@ast
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@en
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@nl
prefLabel
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@ast
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@en
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.
@en
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2288-8-22
P577
2008-04-21T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1004445774