Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
about
Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Cost-Effectiveness of Liraglutide Versus Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the UK.Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisEvaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Daily Administered GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom.Spinal cord stimulation for long-term treatment of severe angina pectoris: what does the evidence say?Current challenges in spinal cord stimulation.The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.Projected long-term outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with fast-acting insulin aspart vs conventional insulin aspart in the UK setting.Alternate Intraspinal Targets for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review.Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide vs lixisenatide for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK setting.
P2860
Q30860051-A5FFC328-ED09-4118-9E25-86287B26FC04Q33732593-CAFF9738-BE2B-49CC-A343-57454CEDA342Q36200993-F7F31CEC-410D-4CBC-B2D0-0AA5DA73F0B8Q37639302-48521DAD-BB53-4A69-8288-6F82DCEAEDF2Q37952254-8E4F1AA7-99AE-4199-8381-3464B6722B21Q38224180-4F54B434-E101-4020-AC79-55CBC7BA1C29Q38238967-58F9A2FD-DE66-4E0F-83E1-81A0C67CEF1DQ38675810-B70217F4-4578-4F14-9D51-D0A3ECB91F6EQ38761681-D5D19620-BF6E-4C0B-B612-BDBBF4511D59Q38765656-6E48820F-0673-4EDB-8420-8DA6AF170262
P2860
Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@ast
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@en
type
label
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@ast
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@en
prefLabel
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@ast
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Clinical and cost-effectivenes ...... na pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
@en
P2093
K A Goldsmith
L D Sharples
M J Buxton
P M Schofield
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1745-6215-9-40
P577
2008-06-30T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1002478356