A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
about
Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking.Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy.Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.A morphological study of lumbar vertebral endplates: radiographic, visual and digital measurements.A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.Validity and reliability of a three-dimensional dental cast simulator for arch dimension measurements.Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review.Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machineAccuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements of resin, plaster, digital and printed study-models.Separation of overlapping dental arch objects using digital records of illuminated plaster casts.Light emitting diode mediated photobiomodulation therapy improves orthodontic tooth movement and miniscrew stability: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Accuracy of three-dimensional printing for manufacturing replica teeth.Efficient digitalization method for dental restorations using micro-CT dataDifferences in molar relationships and occlusal contact areas evaluated from the buccal and lingual aspects using 3-dimensional digital models.Dose- and time-dependent effects of clodronate on orthodontic tooth movement.Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning techniqueA morphometric study of the middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.Digital Three-Dimensional Automation of the Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?Computer-aided modelling of three-dimensional maxillofacial tissues through multi-modal imaging.Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models.Digital 3D image of bimaxillary casts connected by a vestibular scan.Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying Tanaka and Johnston's equation.Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment.Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?Multibracket appliance: impression defaults and their reduction by blocking-out - a three-dimensional study.Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models?A prospective survey of secondary care tooth wear referrals: demographics, reasons for concern and referral outcomes.Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.The association of tongue posture with the dentoalveolar maxillary and mandibular morphology in Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of a single crown fabricated based on a three-dimensional printed model
P2860
Q27309092-6CAA0CC7-66D4-4B05-8D91-D887A9515F5FQ30315816-957E4F55-1FE7-430A-9837-988AC8D56A6BQ31150356-BDDCB7A6-2307-49D2-A328-8EC6230E812AQ33788249-D3723D3C-868F-458E-A4BF-3D1C94F7A2BFQ34320623-E3EAD9CC-D38D-4B38-9F06-D12A851C8A3AQ35199038-AD7A46E5-54BB-4861-A3B1-6F38B5D9F4C6Q35534014-CC9E7F8C-FB7C-44E4-8DEA-E67ACFD825D9Q35560275-B9FE0B41-0562-43B4-B3CC-01933B8C5FD8Q35572013-EAD7C6C9-4B5A-4495-8DA2-DB2A1326C422Q35717935-760AC636-10F6-4AC7-BFCB-B5894EDB1649Q35842708-445B2CEE-FBB8-422A-9447-4A325C6B6BB3Q35978273-F9DF4881-F232-4B75-AC5B-9D7E93550533Q36122974-973CCC4E-1C81-414D-B9DD-5478BE3CFFA1Q36308203-4D7CE8F5-1E7E-4B52-8677-A7D90D9BA6B8Q36349858-275F2680-74C0-4367-AFAA-BCD90EA3C8CEQ37686946-9C3B9E98-F9CE-43FF-8162-60FFB101177DQ38573117-9BE254F2-24F1-4640-8735-7558784D7227Q38921382-9E40545A-E64F-4D93-99A4-50398057098DQ39803476-9729DC62-49EB-4E36-A887-94C3B31FD3CAQ40056384-6B630BBE-236D-4B75-8FCB-B1DBEC6C1BFAQ40063315-74CF4858-987E-45B6-A12E-BBEDB152984AQ40099568-5B204F7E-C110-4092-A12D-5F8616C88B8AQ40114356-0D187D40-DDC5-4903-9FE9-6992D71FB568Q40120659-55E11F33-AB34-40F1-B2BF-5BFE0CF4FD78Q40126076-DA6723C1-ABD3-4498-8316-7DFD6972BBD8Q40197826-0A2BD4B7-911A-41DA-A6B1-3451A1B810EFQ40205425-53D52304-2460-42A2-9206-97A3E83166FDQ40256818-2454960D-E5B4-431A-85D1-437CFE1F6280Q40290582-CAB87BD2-E6B1-47DA-8B86-B3E06022930AQ40457522-643DB522-753B-4C5C-BBDE-E63553E991C5Q40464006-4BBF8390-C47D-49D6-9EC9-5A9A06593011Q44627838-D5C7339B-B7D5-41FD-AAAE-88FE5A7D5296Q48504006-7F062844-D7FA-4B20-824A-23D3F45CD588Q48521876-3AD35F4B-0DBC-41A2-BFAC-47EDCF766A1BQ48579687-45AB8FE2-FC63-4368-85E7-BD97250F1ADFQ58125278-5289DBB3-1A49-4F38-907C-85E44304E3A0
P2860
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@ast
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@en
type
label
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@ast
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@en
prefLabel
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@ast
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@en
P2860
P1476
A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
@en
P2093
Andrew P Keating
Jeremy Knox
P2860
P304
191-201; discussion 175
P356
10.1179/146531207225022626
P407
P577
2008-09-01T00:00:00Z