Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
about
Genome-wide association scan meta-analysis identifies three Loci influencing adiposity and fat distributionAccuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studiesClinical utility of sequence-based genotype compared with that derivable from genotyping arraysAssociation between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in womenMeta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary functionMaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypesNew World cattle show ancestry from multiple independent domestication eventsExploring the Major Sources and Extent of Heterogeneity in a Genome-Wide Association Meta-AnalysisCombining family- and population-based imputation data for association analysis of rare and common variants in large pedigreesA Genomic Approach for Distinguishing between Recent and Ancient Admixture as Applied to Cattle1000 Genomes-based imputation identifies novel and refined associations for the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium phase 1 DataOn combining reference data to improve imputation accuracy.On the performance of multiple imputation based on chained equations in tackling missing data of the African α3.7 -globin deletion in a malaria association studyAccuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.Bias Characterization in Probabilistic Genotype Data and Improved Signal Detection with Multiple ImputationIdentification of Risk Pathways and Functional Modules for Coronary Artery Disease Based on Genome-wide SNP Data.Assessment of genotype imputation methodsSingle versus multiple imputation for genotypic data.Analyses and comparison of imputation-based association methodsUtilizing genotype imputation for the augmentation of sequence data.An empirical evaluation of imputation accuracy for association statistics reveals increased type-I error rates in genome-wide associations.FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov model.Practical considerations for imputation of untyped markers in admixed populations.Performance of genotype imputations using data from the 1000 Genomes Project.Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy Genes through a Genome-Wide Association Study among Mexican-Americans from Starr County, TexasEvaluation of the imputation performance of the program IMPUTE in an admixed sample from Mexico City using several model designsGenotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.Imputation and quality control steps for combining multiple genome-wide datasets.Performance of genotype imputation for low frequency and rare variants from the 1000 genomesPractical Consideration of Genotype Imputation: Sample Size, Window Size, Reference Choice, and Untyped Rate.Molgenis-impute: imputation pipeline in a boxAssociation between SNPs and gene expression in multiple regions of the human brainExploiting genotyping by sequencing to characterize the genomic structure of the American cranberry through high-density linkage mappingAscertainment bias from imputation methods evaluation in wheatCIITA is not associated with risk of developing rheumatoid arthritisEffects of mitochondrial haplogroup N9a on type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications.Comparison of the performance of two commercial genome-wide association study genotyping platforms in Han Chinese samplesPhysical activity, genes for physical fitness, and risk of coronary heart disease
P2860
Q21092459-9FAD9648-7454-40E8-BFA2-EAE8E7214676Q21283815-45578527-9B5A-4ECD-9A05-6C40C8280FC0Q24289049-642E1C42-0C55-4786-9B1C-1D3EC9E57BBCQ24613965-4ADF8B12-9D3F-43D7-931B-96067DBAB228Q24633262-7BB89FBF-7C63-4FD5-BDEE-0868DDDF2EB4Q24635938-8BD84179-7F37-46F2-BC03-836F67B44B96Q28287815-8E55CFEF-0776-475B-8460-4D579D968227Q28387512-95FEE1F2-0125-4910-ADC3-9BA7D27A18C9Q28395566-D83E7820-0F02-4768-82E8-455A5556C9FEQ28658679-0F5D8107-3FF2-488D-885A-FDFF90908951Q28943529-F3CA8387-7CE0-4059-AF5C-41E09A2DBC8EQ30587059-C9DFDF18-5209-4C87-B808-35973C7E3D3BQ30831955-754BB19F-5D89-405F-BB7F-89894F78B319Q30836450-29FAE971-8A4B-47D8-91C6-34F7239D72CAQ30979619-01F6CA3C-82D9-4825-942C-EE807EF18D38Q31108535-176273E2-A473-470A-8095-CB899EDDD1A8Q31148631-4D0DA104-F871-4D34-9D9C-7A08711A2B1AQ33519327-5D7FB648-4BC3-49D0-AB65-897A4C69AB55Q33519363-8ABE7FD8-B091-46D3-B1A0-504022C1C4AAQ33593078-92A196F3-B32B-42B9-8E3B-EBE79C8104E0Q33603074-3C13EC67-5FD1-44BF-9231-D0EBF7418399Q33798550-25079570-76D8-4A54-92DA-CF007A9AA149Q33807685-8BCD6109-81D6-4898-A55D-5F147DED03ADQ34030741-43DFED03-C860-4642-A92A-337B6D036E96Q34115604-40E1555A-ED8B-4B79-B7AA-B7EAE401B656Q34127757-32BBB9FD-FABE-4277-B99D-D5A6B3D1F1BCQ34253087-9E1EF2CD-CC7D-475C-9495-100EFA0D23E8Q34285635-1E3A5A10-92C7-4CEB-A3A7-9A48619BADB7Q34505607-193F9334-5B35-403F-8135-EA21E53303F2Q34677930-275224FB-8DCA-4AC1-AA9F-0E884EBED95BQ35013642-408A36E5-E664-4132-A1A2-1A344E312E81Q35720540-188B3CFF-F259-44D2-A203-C6DDFD55FDDDQ35749760-4D87F925-053D-4416-BAC8-4D1CB168AF25Q36001595-B554971B-14BA-4B8D-AEF5-F130E524564FQ36050689-240CB16F-8BB0-4452-B93C-36167DA61866Q36156494-A841CA2D-EE08-4757-A928-23408B9E0973Q36253879-4DA748DE-53C5-426C-B1CB-994930B0E589Q36334137-5ABF2C90-06E9-4E16-B24A-292B3A5271BCQ36512658-2FCECF23-0AEF-4F15-BEA8-01F7F95280BCQ36707460-C9B91A0A-7B92-4A92-BD09-0222854D6A82
P2860
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@ast
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@en
type
label
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@ast
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@en
prefLabel
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@ast
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods
@en
P2093
Christopher J Papasian
Yu-Fang Pei
P2860
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0003551
P407
P577
2008-10-29T00:00:00Z