The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference.

The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33387639

about

Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer: benefits, challenges, and solutions for underutilization Robotics in Colorectal Surgery Evolution of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review.Image guidance for focal therapy of prostate cancer.Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice.Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience.Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy.Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program Robotic right colectomy: A worthwhile procedure? Results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy.An initial experience with 85 consecutive robotic-assisted rectal dissections: improved operating times and lower costs with experience Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies.Advancing Molecular-Guided Surgery through probe development and testing in a moderate cost evaluation pipeline Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Robotic-Assisted Surgery with Traditional Laparotomy for Rectal Cancer-Indian Study.Advanced applications of robotics in digestive surgery.Effect of a disposable automated suturing device on cost and operating room time in benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis.Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.Robotic surgery for gynaecologic cancer: an overview.Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature.Robotics in general surgery: an evidence-based review.European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care.Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations: a-single center experience.Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.Robotic surgical education: a collaborative approach to training postgraduate urologists and endourology fellows.Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer.Is hybrid robotic laparoscopic assistance the ideal approach for restorative rectal cancer dissection?Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery: A retrospective observational study.Patient quality of life and short-term surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot-assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.Early experience of laparoscopic and robotic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy.

P2860

Q27000105-5E128A4A-B704-4F4C-BA05-4CD853185A4F Q28079254-0A4FF27F-9D17-4511-8D34-103E1305AB07 Q33564109-8BA76442-CBA3-433B-8C70-C1C11657F84A Q33724312-59105B29-733D-4A3A-A3CE-31E2CAA8029E Q33837969-59CA1EF8-A042-498F-A461-83EA44B3C50F Q33888907-33C4B759-A7AB-4F45-BD42-2AFA19169E5A Q34393886-5C2C61BF-9255-4741-8294-3862EE82B2EF Q34401196-148ABC64-F44F-4F63-B023-132B9247A2C6 Q34625085-337A0D37-C765-4DB2-9001-1A8A5545331D Q34908636-11BBC860-9CED-43F2-9C4D-2E4C8F7BC5BF Q34957842-D8832203-F222-4443-9954-B43F27BAD6B5 Q35419094-29DE13FD-737B-4EF5-B830-2C9607615CE2 Q35518032-8EAF6891-366B-43E6-9216-0A47B9A16AC3 Q36044461-8637DA11-6D57-4B6B-901C-63B4C80B5A7B Q36073395-37006123-4C61-4860-85C4-D70B44ED1D70 Q36643427-1AFCE1C5-C7A7-4A6B-A5B8-F96416EDD411 Q37058468-9C2DCDE7-C1F1-44DD-9D46-19C530E525B5 Q37399135-A1D933C8-6980-4200-B31F-D8E20DE39F62 Q37589415-0633ECA1-788F-4137-8965-5A2D475937F5 Q37951746-75885FE4-2F8D-4BAA-B9CE-0C3764E20AB3 Q37960429-6D47F980-2965-48F7-A124-ACDE16945827 Q37965885-D30C937D-9E73-412A-B024-1799A3AF33B8 Q38038985-8B8C4402-D7A8-47ED-ACC0-D5355CAD610D Q38073192-2FF010F2-1F16-4CE3-9360-B47EA3EBD675 Q38216038-18C3FB1B-4CEB-4009-ABBE-E7A091EE7077 Q38266166-1A366A34-A521-4C03-A7D1-0BBA9788CCDF Q38266722-542D1492-EC50-4834-A6FF-5B57DB3D9624 Q38602883-5A736602-B32E-4287-972A-BCCB894E125F Q38999272-F0B55FF6-4141-4F92-996C-B0EBD59224C5 Q39582275-5B03C980-416D-4E48-8D68-EC1579C7A780 Q40103399-D0E33E3A-743C-453A-A67D-14FFCD5679BC Q41639818-BF4D1BBC-5958-499A-A458-CD096DC212DF Q41714224-E9BC5B66-D3C1-472B-9D36-0F4DB94C5E76 Q42616134-D7036E66-9492-4736-BB0F-1BE65C639CAE Q43912261-D9C281AA-14D1-438E-8C7B-EE8A4757FC3F Q45986487-7862AE83-8AAE-4EE0-9FDF-D8D1750BD057 Q47138081-91E1A34D-E87A-473A-AFB7-ACEA64E1DA90 Q47725556-80C94D4F-D56A-495F-9E94-B1B446514935 Q47851081-B39919E5-14AD-4687-8BBF-55613177794C Q50451854-BFB5E701-F042-4530-B0D0-13F7A66A336D

P2860

The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33387639

description

2008 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2008 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2008 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2008年の論文

@ja

2008年論文

@yue

2008年論文

@zh-hant

2008年論文

@zh-hk

2008年論文

@zh-mo

2008年論文

@zh-tw

2008年论文

@wuu

name

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@ast

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@en

type

label

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@ast

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@en

prefLabel

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@ast

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@en

P1433

Q33387639-62335C6D-8707-4529-B51F-90DC5D6C961D

P1476

Q33387639-E0F6F55A-4B03-4947-9A13-91B549337459

P2093

Q33387639-09BA1B2C-BDD2-4755-A664-5DA7F00C6A9C

Q33387639-44139F90-ACF9-4B9D-9463-2A54531FBE82

Q33387639-5A3DE46B-9514-4D82-AE42-6AC356D6A112

Q33387639-BD7B8602-948C-4795-8925-1BB30713A2BC

Q33387639-C306D00A-AC49-45E0-9702-A5325FA02693

Q33387639-C8991773-715F-4C7B-8DB4-58FA9031E7E0

P2860

Q33387639-2C9F3030-8A52-4360-B7E6-187DFDAFC8AE

Q33387639-368B1DC7-B84E-489A-8F5C-54F2BBA5C095

Q33387639-4083B2F8-7239-47D7-8E6E-30910AF11806

Q33387639-4E6E017D-C354-49F7-A55C-B0502B630D6B

Q33387639-776F1302-AEE2-4326-977E-DB93C7E8510F

Q33387639-95366449-4A24-4B7B-A681-7FB9400019F2

Q33387639-AA203185-4CA4-4260-AD59-5EFE0AB1A2A3

P2888

Q33387639-3780F456-9C19-4B9A-8A0C-3AF46B703C50

P304

Q33387639-18E6283C-E4F5-488B-96D7-1350E5C16DFA

P31

Q33387639-0F4EC693-C752-4E60-9567-9AAB257F414A

P356

Q33387639-BA27248C-6634-47B2-A219-2B7DD7C580CA

P407

Q33387639-A21EAEEC-94B1-4D4F-BFE9-EF770C30552F

P433

Q33387639-02093CB6-83B2-4B49-A0E8-E6D369D730AA

P478

Q33387639-D2C667BF-3C0C-46F1-A398-57192F86ED13

P50

Q33387639-7309ED1E-6558-404B-ABF4-9C24CA069804

P577

Q33387639-5C675644-0965-4C01-B2F8-1664D12395BC

P5875

Q33387639-6DEF9027-ADED-42EB-8998-E20921B6D416

P6179

Q33387639-47FD9188-019F-42B6-AB6D-58F6958A5F7A

P698

Q33387639-8609E0B0-6D8C-4382-8BA0-BD1370D34D51

P356

S00464-008-0202-8

P1433

Surgical Endoscopy

P1476

The current status of robotic ...... iplinary consensus conference.

@en

P2093

Antonio Lacy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hans Brölmann

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hubert John

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jonas Udo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robin H Kennedy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Steven D Wexner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Review of a decision by the Medical Services Advisory Committee based on health technology assessment of an emerging technology: the case for remotely assisted radical prostatectomy.

Robotics in urology: an update.

Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy in rats.

Essential elements to the establishment and design of a successful robotic surgery programme.

Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy 'mini-residency' experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns.

Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.

Developing technology for surgery in the UK: a multidisciplinary meeting of engineers and surgeons.

P2888

s00464-008-0202-8

P304

438-443

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00464-008-0202-8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

23

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Roberto Bergamaschi

P577

2008-11-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

23501486

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1023618327

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19037694

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string