Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
about
All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol caseShared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation."Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practicePatient Preferences and Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureAnalysis of time to event outcomes in randomized controlled trials by generalized additive modelsInterprofessional collaboration regarding patients' care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factorsRandomised controlled trial of three day versus 10 day intravenous antibiotics in acute pyelonephritis: effect on renal scarringEffects of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient-based decision analysis.Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of an Extended Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Programme in Ghana: A Qualitative Study of Caregivers and Community Health WorkersInvolve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettesThe informational needs of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis-development of an informational needs questionnaireHow to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting.Can Decision Support Help Patients With Spinal Stenosis Make a Treatment Choice?: A Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of a Patient Decision Aid and Health Coaching.The interdisciplinary eHealth team: chronic care for the future.Modular prevention of heart disease following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [ISRCTN42984084]Development and testing of innovative patient resources for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD): a descriptive studyHow do patients with inflammatory bowel disease want their biological therapy administered?Concordance between patient satisfaction and the dentist's view: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.Configural frequency analysis as a method of determining patients' preferred decision-making roles in dialysisWhat do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocolA patient led NHS: managing demand at the interface between lay and primary careManaging demand at the interface between primary and secondary care.Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.Patient education and decision making in breast reconstruction.Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery.Using Argumentation Theory to Identify the Challenges of Shared Decision-Making when the Doctor and the Patient have a Difference of Opinion.Preferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depressionA factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patientsInconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey.Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?Negotiating consent: exploring ethical issues when therapeutic massage bodywork practitioners are trained in multiple therapiesDevelopment and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS).The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study.
P2860
Q24524199-6997BA19-45B8-4406-9CF7-C7EA789D3ECBQ24534330-4527D87D-4F09-4B86-8733-DF438269AC8AQ24811772-891C9A4D-C1EF-451F-96E6-273C9C1BD5D1Q26770918-48C4A150-AAB7-4C20-9830-3D19EE71CB83Q27309297-55E637F6-F00C-4FE4-8272-BE77D0EBDCD3Q27313840-69857022-2612-46A2-8402-569175ECD0AEQ28350947-7AAFD87A-1CC2-4865-9C72-03451DA499D1Q28364493-B0D58E57-F32D-4C11-88A1-F6592D220737Q28554508-624570C5-BFD0-4185-B836-43526CE5D944Q30479799-C04915D1-CECC-4C7D-9280-A877F55D493FQ30490450-104C628D-9441-42BF-BC6C-E5F5FE49088DQ30584285-ECC73726-FC84-46D2-A81C-404EADA2EDE2Q30664421-2B98DCD1-10A0-418F-A916-C3C218828238Q30733706-1B281FF6-3FC5-4F93-B7A1-349ECD0F063FQ31119299-5A28718B-7DE4-4586-982C-4BBF426399F6Q33246184-DD31ADD1-548C-4D0F-9E5A-F92E4B0AD38AQ33252927-CDA7DD8A-1E59-4C43-B4DB-2A12F99C18BCQ33523157-948E9CDF-700A-46ED-B7D7-22F0B3B909CFQ33612944-9523558B-C82F-402E-8E67-9250B2A47D82Q33669504-E81C1E41-E5B3-4108-A145-944308EF9C2EQ33690087-DA2974F5-C26D-44FD-999F-E007AEF30F58Q33733306-8358B85E-A429-4D51-845E-21B53C30FF05Q33742889-F6F1AC9B-976D-47B8-895B-FF8B2ABE4E3CQ33790551-8F5D4373-DE57-49D4-8180-06A69734B5A7Q33790757-293A6D8E-07F9-451A-88EF-CD9B5BA3EED0Q33793584-5DE7D687-B48F-453B-8F37-3E15190285C7Q33804535-EFD17E94-5746-4779-B665-3887663D90A4Q33909773-5594A405-6349-4C03-BFEA-53BFE2BA88FBQ34068343-B4787C73-B004-415A-A3A8-7E1B53B05EDFQ34074106-1BEC21F5-8D46-4184-A51E-E1444EE3A21AQ34097159-D2A27971-021C-425D-A474-67A2AFA8A056Q34223762-9A6BB2F0-2B73-4F6D-A42D-B8BB91EA0DAEQ34271678-C2B6D118-D596-4E18-BB7B-C4601E0A6B75Q34316540-E15AC52E-FCE7-4655-875E-A46924025670Q34354187-B793F48B-B7B4-41C2-BC81-0BE460120E78Q34354195-82EA0898-A5B7-4D27-8CA4-44E235D506C8Q34354202-DD784528-438F-4917-8B3C-BA4D4BE81650Q34557742-0BDCF722-4D7E-48E7-9279-5E51C58ADD56Q34573624-A836801E-7829-4113-BDB4-1B6D13B9AE58Q34627157-B51372DB-1737-4300-AE7B-FA5E5C86C4FB
P2860
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1997 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年論文
@yue
1997年論文
@zh-hant
1997年論文
@zh-hk
1997年論文
@zh-mo
1997年論文
@zh-tw
1997年论文
@wuu
name
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@ast
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@en
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@nl
type
label
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@ast
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@en
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@nl
prefLabel
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@ast
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@en
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@nl
P1476
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.
@en
P2093
P304
P577
1997-04-01T00:00:00Z